Nioxin System 4 Color Save - Revitalizing conditioner for colored hair that falls out - 300 ml vs Paul Mitchell, Extra-Body Conditioner , 10.14 fl oz (300 ml)

Nioxin System 4 Color Save - Revitalizing conditioner for colored hair that falls out - 300 ml and Paul Mitchell, Extra-Body Conditioner , 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) share 7 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 7Nioxin System 4 Color Save - Revitalizing conditioner for colored hair that falls out - 300 ml only 27Paul Mitchell, Extra-Body Conditioner , 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) only 15

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

14%

Ingredients in every formula: 7in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 2unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 49rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

49 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(42 of 49 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Nioxin Nioxin System 4 Color Save - Revitalizing conditioner for colored hair that falls out - 300 ml $29.00	Recommended Paul Mitchell Paul Mitchell, Extra-Body Conditioner , 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) $19.98
Basics
Type & size	Conditioner · size not on the record	Conditioner · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	panthenol, niacinamide	hydrolyzed wheat protein, panthenol
Free of	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, silicone-free	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, silicone-free
Heads-updiffers	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 34 ingredients	Fully parsed · 22 ingredients
Key actives · 2
hydrolyzed wheat protein	no	yes
vitamin b3	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 40
algae extract	no	yes
aloe barbadensis leaf extract	no	yes
anthemis nobilis flower extract	no	yes
benzyl alcohol	yes	no
benzyl benzoate	no	yes
biotin	yes	no
camellia sinensis leaf extract	yes	no
cetearyl alcohol	yes	no
cetrimonium chloride	no	yes
ci 42090	yes	no
citric acid	yes	no
cocodimonium hydroxypropyl hydrolyzed wheat protein	no	yes
cystine bis-pg-propyl silanetriol	yes	no
dicetyldimonium chloride	no	yes
disodium phosphate	yes	no
distearyldimonium chloride	yes	no
edta	yes	no
faex extract	yes	no
fragrance	no	yes
glyceryl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
hydrolyzed wheat protein pg-propyl silanetriol	no	yes
hydrolyzed wheat starch	no	yes
hydroxyethylcellulose	yes	no
hydroxypropyl guar	yes	no
isobutylparaben	no	yes
lecithin	yes	no
maltodextrin	yes	no
mentha arvensis leaf oil	yes	no
oleyl alcohol	yes	no
peg-12 dimethicone	no	yes
potassium sorbate	yes	no
sodium benzoate	yes	no
sodium phosphate	yes	no
stearamidopropyl dimethylamine	yes	no
stearyl alcohol	yes	no
tocopheryl acetate	yes	no
vaccinium myrtillus leaf extract	yes	no
water	yes	no
water	no	yes
wheat amino acids	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Nioxin if you want Vitamin B3 in the formula.

Choose Paul Mitchell if you want Hydrolyzed Wheat Protein in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.