Wella Professionals SP Hydrate conditioner for dry hair 1000 ml vs Nioxin System 4 Color Save - Revitalizing conditioner for colored hair that falls out - 300 ml

Wella Professionals SP Hydrate conditioner for dry hair 1000 ml and Nioxin System 4 Color Save - Revitalizing conditioner for colored hair that falls out - 300 ml share 13 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 13Wella Professionals SP Hydrate conditioner for dry hair 1000 ml only 18Nioxin System 4 Color Save - Revitalizing conditioner for colored hair that falls out - 300 ml only 21

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

25%

Ingredients in every formula: 13in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 3unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 52rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

52 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(39 of 52 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Wella Wella Professionals SP Hydrate conditioner for dry hair 1000 ml $37.00	Recommended Nioxin Nioxin System 4 Color Save - Revitalizing conditioner for colored hair that falls out - 300 ml $29.00
Basics
Type & size	Conditioner · size not on the record	Conditioner · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	urea	panthenol, niacinamide
Free of	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, silicone-free	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, silicone-free
Heads-up	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 31 ingredients	Fully parsed · 34 ingredients
Key actives · 3
pro-vitamin b5	no	yes
urea	yes	no
vitamin b3	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 36
aminopropyl dimethicone	yes	no
aspartic acid	yes	no
benzyl benzoate	yes	no
benzyl salicylate	yes	no
biotin	no	yes
butylparaben	no	yes
camellia sinensis leaf extract	no	yes
ci 42090	no	yes
ci 47005	yes	no
cystine bis-pg-propyl silanetriol	no	yes
dextrin	yes	no
disodium phosphate	no	yes
distearyldimonium chloride	no	yes
edta	no	yes
ethylparaben	no	yes
faex extract	no	yes
fragrance	yes	no
fructose	yes	no
glucose	yes	no
glutamic acid	yes	no
glycerin	yes	no
hexyl cinnamal	yes	no
hexyl nicotinate	yes	no
hexylene glycol	yes	no
hydroxyethylcellulose	no	yes
lecithin	no	yes
limonene	yes	no
linalool	yes	no
maltodextrin	no	yes
mentha arvensis leaf oil	no	yes
potassium sorbate	no	yes
sodium benzoate	no	yes
sodium phosphate	no	yes
sucrose	yes	no
tocopheryl acetate	no	yes
vaccinium myrtillus leaf extract	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Wella if you want Urea in the formula.

Choose Nioxin if you want Pro-vitamin B5 in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.