Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml vs Nioxin System 4 Color Save - Revitalizing conditioner for colored hair that falls out - 300 ml

Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml and Nioxin System 4 Color Save - Revitalizing conditioner for colored hair that falls out - 300 ml share 14 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 14Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml only 28Nioxin System 4 Color Save - Revitalizing conditioner for colored hair that falls out - 300 ml only 20

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

23%

Ingredients in every formula: 14in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 2unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 62rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

62 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(48 of 62 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Wella Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml $26.00	Recommended Nioxin Nioxin System 4 Color Save - Revitalizing conditioner for colored hair that falls out - 300 ml $29.00
Basics
Type & size	Conditioner · size not on the record	Conditioner · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	panthenol, lactic acid	panthenol, niacinamide
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, silicone-free
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 42 ingredients	Fully parsed · 34 ingredients
Key actives · 2
aha exfoliant (gentle)	yes	no
vitamin b3	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 46
alpha-isomethyl ionone	yes	no
amodimethicone	yes	no
ascorbyl palmitate Pregnancy: generally fine Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
benzyl alcohol	no	yes
benzyl salicylate	yes	no
bht	yes	no
biotin	no	yes
ci 42090	no	yes
citral	yes	no
citronellol	yes	no
coumarin	yes	no
cystine bis-pg-propyl silanetriol	no	yes
disodium edta	yes	no
disodium phosphate	no	yes
distearyldimonium chloride	no	yes
drying alcohol	yes	no
edta	no	yes
ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate Pregnancy: caution	yes	no
faex extract	no	yes
fragrance	yes	no
geraniol	yes	no
glycerin	yes	no
glyceryl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride	yes	no
hexyl cinnamal	yes	no
hydroxypropyl guar	no	yes
imidazolidinyl urea	yes	no
lecithin	no	yes
limonene	yes	no
linalool	yes	no
lycium barbarum fruit extract	yes	no
maltodextrin	no	yes
mentha arvensis leaf oil	no	yes
methylparaben	no	yes
oleic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
oleyl alcohol	no	yes
orbignya oleifera seed oil	yes	no
propylene glycol	yes	no
pvp	yes	no
sodium phosphate	no	yes
stearalkonium chloride	yes	no
stearamidopropyl dimethylamine	no	yes
stearyl alcohol	no	yes
tetrasodium edta	yes	no
vaccinium myrtillus leaf extract	no	yes
vitamin e	yes	no

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Wella if you want AHA exfoliant (gentle) in the formula.

Choose Nioxin if you want Vitamin B3 in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.