Wella Ultimate Repair Conditioner - regenerating hair conditioner, 500 ml vs Redken Silicone-free conditioner Acidic Bonding curly hair - 1000 ml

Wella Ultimate Repair Conditioner - regenerating hair conditioner, 500 ml and Redken Silicone-free conditioner Acidic Bonding curly hair - 1000 ml share 8 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 8Wella Ultimate Repair Conditioner - regenerating hair conditioner, 500 ml only 21Redken Silicone-free conditioner Acidic Bonding curly hair - 1000 ml only 13

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

19%

Ingredients in every formula: 8in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 0unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 42rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

42 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(34 of 42 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Wella Wella Ultimate Repair Conditioner - regenerating hair conditioner, 500 ml $67.00	Redken Redken Silicone-free conditioner Acidic Bonding curly hair - 1000 ml $98.00
Basics
Type & size	Conditioner · size not on the record	Conditioner · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key actives	Not recorded	Not recorded
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, paraben-free	sulfate-free, paraben-free, silicone-free
Heads-up	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 29 ingredients	Fully parsed · 21 ingredients
Rest of the labels · 34
amodimethicone	yes	no
ascorbyl palmitate Pregnancy: generally fine Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
cetearyl alcohol	no	yes
citronellol	no	yes
coco-glucoside	yes	no
coconut oil	no	yes
disodium edta	yes	no
distearoylethyl dimonium chloride	no	yes
edta	yes	no
ethylhexylglycerin	yes	no
fatty alcohol (non-drying)	yes	no
glycerin	no	yes
glyceryl oleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
glycine	no	yes
guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride	yes	no
histidine	yes	no
hydrogenated palm glycerides citrate	yes	no
hydroxyethyl urea	no	yes
hydroxypropyl guar	no	yes
lecithin	yes	no
limonene	no	yes
malic acid	yes	no
octyldodecanol	no	yes
oleic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
paraffinum liquidum	yes	no
potato starch modified	no	yes
propylene glycol dicaprylate	yes	no
sodium benzoate	yes	no
sodium citrate	no	yes
sodium hydroxide	yes	no
sorbitan oleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
sorbitol	no	yes
tocopheryl acetate	yes	no
vitamin e	yes	no

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Wella if you want a comparable formula for $31.00 less.

Choose Redken if you want this formula as listed.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.