[fino] Premium Touch Conditioner 550ml vs Wella Ultimate Repair Conditioner - regenerating hair conditioner, 500 ml

[fino] Premium Touch Conditioner 550ml and Wella Ultimate Repair Conditioner - regenerating hair conditioner, 500 ml share 11 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 11[fino] Premium Touch Conditioner 550ml only 23Wella Ultimate Repair Conditioner - regenerating hair conditioner, 500 ml only 18

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

21%

Ingredients in every formula: 11in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 3unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 52rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

52 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(41 of 52 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Fino [fino] Premium Touch Conditioner 550ml $17.22 $17.22 at Dodoskin ↗	Wella Wella Ultimate Repair Conditioner - regenerating hair conditioner, 500 ml $67.00
Basics
Type & size	Conditioner · size not on the record	Conditioner · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buydiffers	$17.22 · Dodoskin	Not recorded
Availabilitydiffers	Not recorded	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	salicylic acid, squalane, lactic acid	Not recorded
Free of	sulfate-free, paraben-free	sulfate-free, paraben-free
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 34 ingredients	Fully parsed · 29 ingredients
Key actives · 3
aha exfoliant (gentle)	yes	no
bha exfoliant	yes	no
squalane	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 38
a silicone	yes	no
alpha-isomethyl ionone	yes	no
aminopropyl dimethicone	yes	no
ascorbyl palmitate Pregnancy: generally fine Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
behenyl alcohol	yes	no
benzyl benzoate	yes	no
butylene glycol	yes	no
c10-13 isoparaffin	yes	no
cetrimonium chloride	yes	no
citric acid	no	yes
coco-glucoside	no	yes
dipropylene glycol	yes	no
edta	no	yes
ethylhexylglycerin	no	yes
glycerin	yes	no
glyceryl oleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride	no	yes
hexyl cinnamal	yes	no
histidine	no	yes
hydrogenated palm glycerides citrate	no	yes
isopentyldiol	yes	no
lecithin	no	yes
malic acid	no	yes
oleic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
paraffinum liquidum	no	yes
pca	yes	no
peg-2 laurate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
petrolatum	yes	no
propylene glycol dicaprylate	no	yes
royal jelly extract	yes	no
sodium hydroxide	no	yes
sodium methyltaurate	yes	no
sorbitan oleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
sorbitol	yes	no
stearyl alcohol	yes	no
tocopheryl acetate	no	yes
water	yes	no
water	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Fino if you want BHA exfoliant in the formula.

Choose Wella if you want this formula as listed.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.