Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml and Paul Mitchell, Extra-Body Conditioner , 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) share 7 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 7Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml only 35Paul Mitchell, Extra-Body Conditioner , 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) only 15
Permalink for this comparison →
12%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Conditioner · size not on the record | Conditioner · size not on the record |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Availability | in stock | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | panthenol, lactic acid | hydrolyzed wheat protein, panthenol |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 42 ingredients | Fully parsed · 22 ingredients |
Key actives · 2 | ||
aha exfoliant (gentle) | yes | no |
hydrolyzed wheat protein | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 48 | ||
algae extract | no | yes |
aloe barbadensis leaf extract | no | yes |
alpha-isomethyl ionone | yes | no |
amodimethicone | yes | no |
anthemis nobilis flower extract | no | yes |
ascorbyl palmitate | yes | no |
benzyl benzoate | no | yes |
benzyl salicylate | yes | no |
bht | yes | no |
camellia sinensis leaf extract | yes | no |
cetearyl alcohol | yes | no |
cetrimonium chloride | no | yes |
citral | yes | no |
citric acid | yes | no |
citronellol | yes | no |
cocodimonium hydroxypropyl hydrolyzed wheat protein | no | yes |
coumarin | yes | no |
dicetyldimonium chloride | no | yes |
disodium edta | yes | no |
drying alcohol | yes | no |
ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate | yes | no |
geraniol | yes | no |
glycerin | yes | no |
guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride | yes | no |
hexyl cinnamal | yes | no |
hydrolyzed wheat protein pg-propyl silanetriol | no | yes |
hydrolyzed wheat starch | no | yes |
hydroxyethylcellulose | yes | no |
imidazolidinyl urea | yes | no |
isobutylparaben | no | yes |
limonene | yes | no |
linalool | yes | no |
lycium barbarum fruit extract | yes | no |
methylparaben | no | yes |
oleic acid | yes | no |
orbignya oleifera seed oil | yes | no |
peg-12 dimethicone | no | yes |
potassium sorbate | yes | no |
propylene glycol | yes | no |
pvp | yes | no |
sodium benzoate | yes | no |
stearalkonium chloride | yes | no |
tetrasodium edta | yes | no |
tocopheryl acetate | yes | no |
vitamin e | yes | no |
water | yes | no |
water | no | yes |
wheat amino acids | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Wella if you want AHA exfoliant (gentle) in the formula.
Choose Paul Mitchell if you want Hydrolyzed Wheat Protein in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.