Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml vs Curlsmith, Multi-Tasking Conditioner, For Damaged Hair, 8 fl oz (237 ml)

Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml and Curlsmith, Multi-Tasking Conditioner, For Damaged Hair, 8 fl oz (237 ml) share 13 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 13Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml only 29Curlsmith, Multi-Tasking Conditioner, For Damaged Hair, 8 fl oz (237 ml) only 12

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

24%

Ingredients in every formula: 13in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 1unique active
Ingredient rows compared: 54rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.

The formulas, row by row

54 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(41 of 54 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Wella Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml $26.00	Curlsmith Curlsmith, Multi-Tasking Conditioner, For Damaged Hair, 8 fl oz (237 ml) $28.00
Basics
Type & size	Conditioner · size not on the record	Conditioner · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	panthenol, lactic acid	panthenol
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free	Not recorded
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 42 ingredients	Partially captured — 25 of 36 label entries matched, some checks not run
Key actives · 1
aha exfoliant (gentle)	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 40
alpha-isomethyl ionone	yes	no
amodimethicone	yes	no
ascorbyl palmitate Pregnancy: generally fine Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
astrocaryum murumuru seed butter	no	yes
behentrimonium chloride	no	yes
benzyl alcohol	no	yes
benzyl salicylate	yes	no
bht	yes	no
butylparaben	yes	no
camellia sinensis leaf extract	yes	no
citral	yes	no
coumarin	yes	no
dicaprylyl carbonate	no	yes
drying alcohol	yes	no
ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate Pregnancy: caution	yes	no
ethylhexylglycerin	no	yes
ethylparaben	yes	no
fatty alcohol (non-drying)	yes	no
guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride	yes	no
hexyl cinnamal	yes	no
hydrolyzed hemp seed extract	no	yes
hydrolyzed rice protein	no	yes
hydroxyethylcellulose	yes	no
hydroxypropylammonium gluconate	no	yes
hydroxypropylgluconamide	no	yes
imidazolidinyl urea	yes	no
lycium barbarum fruit extract	yes	no
oleic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
orbignya oleifera seed oil	yes	no
propylene glycol	yes	no
propylparaben	yes	no
pvp	yes	no
sodium hydroxide	no	yes
stearalkonium chloride	yes	no
tartaric acid	no	yes
tetrasodium edta	yes	no
tocopheryl acetate	yes	no
vitamin e	yes	no
water	yes	no
water	no	yes

Curlsmith's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Wella if you want AHA exfoliant (gentle) in the formula.

Choose Curlsmith if you want this formula as listed.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.