Rich Hydration Hair Conditioner vs Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml
Rich Hydration Hair Conditioner and Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml share 9 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 9Rich Hydration Hair Conditioner only 6Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml only 33
Permalink for this comparison →
Shared formula
19%
- Ingredients in every formula
- 9in both formulas
- Key actives unique to one formula
- 1unique active
- Ingredient rows compared
- 48rows compared
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
The formulas, row by row
48 ingredients across 2 labels| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Conditioner · size not on the record | Conditioner · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | European | Not recorded |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $33.60 · Cerqular | Not recorded |
| Availabilitydiffers | Not recorded | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | panthenol | panthenol, lactic acid |
| Free ofdiffers | Not recorded | sulfate-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 15 of 128 label entries matched, some checks not run | Fully parsed · 42 ingredients |
Key actives · 1 | ||
aha exfoliant (gentle) | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 38 | ||
alpha-isomethyl ionone | no | yes |
amodimethicone | no | yes |
ascorbyl palmitate | no | yes |
benzyl salicylate | no | yes |
bht | no | yes |
butylparaben | no | yes |
camellia sinensis leaf extract | no | yes |
cetrimonium chloride | yes | no |
citronellol | no | yes |
coumarin | no | yes |
disodium edta | no | yes |
drying alcohol | no | yes |
ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate | no | yes |
ethylparaben | no | yes |
geraniol | no | yes |
glycerin | no | yes |
guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride | no | yes |
hexyl cinnamal | no | yes |
hydroxyethylcellulose | no | yes |
imidazolidinyl urea | no | yes |
isoamyl laurate | yes | no |
limonene | no | yes |
lycium barbarum fruit extract | no | yes |
mentha piperita oil | yes | no |
oleic acid | no | yes |
orbignya oleifera seed oil | no | yes |
potassium sorbate | no | yes |
propylene glycol | no | yes |
propylparaben | no | yes |
pvp | no | yes |
saccharide isomerate | yes | no |
sodium benzoate | no | yes |
sodium citrate | yes | no |
stearalkonium chloride | no | yes |
tetrasodium edta | no | yes |
vitamin e | no | yes |
water | yes | no |
water | no | yes |
Pelegrims's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
The bottom line
Choose Pelegrims if you want this formula as listed.
Choose Wella if you want AHA exfoliant (gentle) in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Focus on an effect
People also compare
- PelegrimsShampoo and Conditioner Duo Set
- WellaDr.Groot Addict Shampoo Classic White 385ml
- PelegrimsConditioner 5 Litre Refill
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.