[fino] Premium Touch Conditioner 550ml vs Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml

[fino] Premium Touch Conditioner 550ml and Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml share 12 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 12[fino] Premium Touch Conditioner 550ml only 22Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml only 30

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

19%

Ingredients in every formula: 12in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 3unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 64rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

64 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(52 of 64 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Fino [fino] Premium Touch Conditioner 550ml $17.22 $17.22 at Dodoskin ↗	Wella Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml $26.00
Basics
Type & size	Conditioner · size not on the record	Conditioner · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buydiffers	$17.22 · Dodoskin	Not recorded
Availabilitydiffers	Not recorded	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	salicylic acid, squalane, lactic acid	panthenol, lactic acid
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, paraben-free	sulfate-free
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 34 ingredients	Fully parsed · 42 ingredients
Key actives · 3
bha exfoliant	yes	no
pro-vitamin b5	no	yes
squalane	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 49
a silicone	yes	no
aminopropyl dimethicone	yes	no
ascorbyl palmitate Pregnancy: generally fine Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
behentrimonium chloride	yes	no
behenyl alcohol	yes	no
benzyl benzoate	yes	no
benzyl salicylate	no	yes
bht	no	yes
butylene glycol	yes	no
butylparaben	no	yes
c10-13 isoparaffin	yes	no
camellia sinensis leaf extract	no	yes
cetearyl alcohol	no	yes
cetrimonium chloride	yes	no
citral	no	yes
citric acid	no	yes
citronellol	no	yes
coumarin	no	yes
dipropylene glycol	yes	no
drying alcohol	no	yes
ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate Pregnancy: caution	no	yes
ethylparaben	no	yes
geraniol	no	yes
guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride	no	yes
hydroxyethylcellulose	no	yes
imidazolidinyl urea	no	yes
isopentyldiol	yes	no
isopropyl alcohol	yes	no
isopropyl myristate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
limonene	no	yes
lycium barbarum fruit extract	no	yes
oleic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
orbignya oleifera seed oil	no	yes
pca	yes	no
peg-2 laurate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
petrolatum	yes	no
potassium sorbate	no	yes
propylene glycol	no	yes
propylparaben	no	yes
pvp	no	yes
royal jelly extract	yes	no
sodium methyltaurate	yes	no
sorbitol	yes	no
stearalkonium chloride	no	yes
stearyl alcohol	yes	no
tetrasodium edta	no	yes
tocopheryl acetate	no	yes
water	yes	no
water	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Fino if you want BHA exfoliant in the formula.

Choose Wella if you want Pro-vitamin B5 in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.