Essential storage keeps the site working. Optional cookies and tracking support analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools.
Either choice lets you browse. Change it anytime in the footer. Cookie details.
[Centellian24] 360 Shot PDRN Lifting Eye Cream 30ml and numbuzin No.9 NAD+ Retinol Volumetox Eye Cream (10ml / 0.34 fl oz) share 18 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 18[Centellian24] 360 Shot PDRN Lifting Eye Cream 30ml only 52numbuzin No.9 NAD+ Retinol Volumetox Eye Cream (10ml / 0.34 fl oz) only 29
Permalink for this comparison →
Loading product details…
18%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Eye cream · size not on the record | Eye cream · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | No offers listed | No offers listed |
| Availability | No offers listed | No offers listed |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, centella asiatica extract, retinol, retinyl palmitate, retinal, ascorbic acid, ceramide np | niacinamide, ceramide np, retinol, hyaluronic acid, sodium hyaluronate |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | Not recorded |
| Heads-updiffers | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag | pregnancy caution · photosensitizingPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 70 ingredients | Partially captured — 47 of 81 label entries matched, some checks not run |
Key actives · 6 | ||
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
Rest of the labels · 75 | ||
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
numbuzin's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Centellian24 if you want Cica in the formula.
Choose numbuzin if you want a comparable formula for $8.50 less.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.