Cicabio Baume Lèvres réparateur « effect pensement » and [TIRTIR] Glow Pop Tinted Lip Oil 4.3g share 5 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 5Cicabio Baume Lèvres réparateur « effect pensement » only 13[TIRTIR] Glow Pop Tinted Lip Oil 4.3g only 35
Permalink for this comparison →
9%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Lip care · size not on the record | Lip care · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | European | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | Not recorded | $25.30 · Ballagrio |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | squalane, sodium hyaluronate | titanium dioxide, squalane, argania spinosa kernel oil, sodium hyaluronate, ascorbic acid, retinyl palmitate, hyaluronic acid |
| Free of | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Heads-updiffers | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy caution · photosensitizingPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 18 of 25 label entries matched, some checks not run | Partially captured — 40 of 56 label entries matched, some checks not run |
Key actives · 5 | ||
argan oil | no | yes |
hyaluronic acid | no | yes |
retinyl palmitate | no | yes |
titanium dioxide | no | yes |
vitamin c | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 43 | ||
1,2-hexanediol | no | yes |
acetyl dipeptide-1 cetyl ester | yes | no |
aluminum hydroxide | no | yes |
ammonium polyacrylate | no | yes |
biotin | no | yes |
camellia japonica seed oil | no | yes |
caprylhydroxamic acid | no | yes |
caprylyl glycol | no | yes |
carnitine hcl | no | yes |
cetyl palmitate | yes | no |
diisostearyl malate | no | yes |
diphenyl dimethicone | no | yes |
ethylcellulose | no | yes |
ethylhexylglycerin | no | yes |
folic acid | no | yes |
fragrance | no | yes |
fructooligosaccharides | yes | no |
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid | no | yes |
hydrolyzed sodium hyaluronate | no | yes |
hydroxypropyltrimonium hyaluronate | no | yes |
jojoba esters | yes | no |
mannitol | yes | no |
menthoxypropanediol | no | yes |
octyldodecanol | no | yes |
pantothenic acid | no | yes |
pentylene glycol | yes | no |
phenoxyethanol | no | yes |
pongamia glabra seed oil | yes | no |
potassium hyaluronate | no | yes |
rhamnose | yes | no |
riboflavin | no | yes |
rosa canina fruit extract | no | yes |
sodium acetylated hyaluronate | no | yes |
sodium hyaluronate crosspolymer | no | yes |
sodium polyglutamate | yes | no |
sorbitan isostearate | no | yes |
thiamine hcl | no | yes |
trihydroxystearin | yes | no |
vitamin e | no | yes |
water | yes | no |
water | no | yes |
xylitol | yes | no |
xylose | yes | no |
Bioderma and TIRTIR have labels only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Bioderma if you avoid fragrance.
Choose TIRTIR if you want Titanium Dioxide in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.