Essential storage keeps the site working. Optional cookies and tracking support analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools.
Either choice lets you browse. Change it anytime in the footer. Cookie details.
Benton AC BHA Foam Cleansing 120ml and [Celladix] Triple Retinol Peeling Pad 120ml 60EA share 18 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 18Benton AC BHA Foam Cleansing 120ml only 23[Celladix] Triple Retinol Peeling Pad 120ml 60EA only 34
Permalink for this comparison →
Loading product details…
24%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Exfoliant · size not on the record | Exfoliant · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | Korean | Not recorded |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | No offers listed | $40.20 · Ballagrio |
| Availabilitydiffers | No offers listed | In stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | salicylic acid, sodium hyaluronate, allantoin, centella asiatica extract | niacinamide, allantoin, hyaluronic acid, sodium hyaluronate, bakuchiol, salicylic acid, panthenol, sodium ascorbyl phosphate, ceramide np, retinal, ascorbic acid, centella asiatica extract |
| Free ofdiffers | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-up | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 41 ingredients | Fully parsed · 52 ingredients |
Key actives · 8 | ||
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
Rest of the labels · 49 | ||
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Benton if you want a comparable formula for $2.20 less.
Choose Celladix if you want Vitamin B3 in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.