Essential storage keeps the site working. Optional cookies and tracking support analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools.
Either choice lets you browse. Change it anytime in the footer. Cookie details.
Wilda Siberica Glow Pet Conditioner, 400ml and Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml share 9 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 9Wilda Siberica Glow Pet Conditioner, 400ml only 9Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml only 33
Permalink for this comparison →
Loading product details…
18%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | Recommended ![]() Wella Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml$26.00 | |
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Conditioner · size not on the record | Conditioner · size not on the record |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | No offers listed | No offers listed |
| Availability | No offers listed | No offers listed |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | ascorbyl glucoside | panthenol, lactic acid |
| Free ofdiffers | Not recorded | sulfate-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 18 of 29 label entries matched, some checks not run | Fully parsed · 42 ingredients |
Key actives · 3 | ||
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
Rest of the labels · 39 | ||
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
Wilda Siberica's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.