Wella Professionals SP Hydrate conditioner for dry hair 1000 ml vs Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml)

Wella Professionals SP Hydrate conditioner for dry hair 1000 ml and Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) share 9 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 9Wella Professionals SP Hydrate conditioner for dry hair 1000 ml only 22Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) only 22

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

17%

Ingredients in every formula: 9in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 2unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 53rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

53 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(44 of 53 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Wella Wella Professionals SP Hydrate conditioner for dry hair 1000 ml $37.00	Recommended Paul Mitchell Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) $25.14
Basics
Type & size	Conditioner · size not on the record	Conditioner · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	urea	panthenol
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, silicone-free	sulfate-free, paraben-free
Heads-up	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coverage	Fully parsed · 31 ingredients	Fully parsed · 31 ingredients
Key actives · 2
pro-vitamin b5	no	yes
urea	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 42
a silicone	no	yes
alcohol	no	yes
aminopropyl dimethicone	yes	no
aspartic acid	yes	no
behentrimonium methosulfate	no	yes
benzyl alcohol	yes	no
benzyl benzoate	yes	no
benzyl salicylate	yes	no
bht	no	yes
ci 47005	yes	no
dextrin	yes	no
disodium edta	no	yes
disodium phosphate	no	yes
fatty alcohol (non-drying)	yes	no
fructose	yes	no
glucose	yes	no
glutamic acid	yes	no
glycerin	yes	no
hexyl nicotinate	yes	no
hexylene glycol	yes	no
hydroxyethylcellulose	no	yes
hydroxypropyl guar	yes	no
linalool	yes	no
magnesium chloride	no	yes
magnesium nitrate	no	yes
methylchloroisothiazolinone	no	yes
methylisothiazolinone	no	yes
methylparaben	yes	no
olealkonium chloride	no	yes
panthenyl ethyl ether	no	yes
peg-2m	no	yes
phenoxyethanol	yes	no
propylparaben	yes	no
sodium benzoate	no	yes
sodium hydroxide	no	yes
sodium phosphate	no	yes
stearyl alcohol	yes	no
sucrose	yes	no
tetramethyl acetyloctahydronaphthalenes	no	yes
tridecane	no	yes
undecane	no	yes
vitamin e	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Wella if you want Urea in the formula.

Choose Paul Mitchell if you want Pro-vitamin B5 in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.