Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml vs L'Angelica Officinalis Sebum-Regulating Shampoo 250 ml

Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml and L'Angelica Officinalis Sebum-Regulating Shampoo 250 ml share 11 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 11Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml only 22L'Angelica Officinalis Sebum-Regulating Shampoo 250 ml only 11

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

25%

Ingredients in every formula: 11in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 1unique active
Ingredient rows compared: 44rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

44 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(33 of 44 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Wella Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml $42.00	L'angelica L'Angelica Officinalis Sebum-Regulating Shampoo 250 ml $3.00
Basics
Type & size	Shampoo · size not on the record	Shampoo · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	panthenol, salicylic acid, lactic acid	lactic acid, panthenol
Free ofdiffers	alcohol-free	alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	photosensitizing · fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 33 ingredients	Fully parsed · 22 ingredients
Key actives · 1
bha exfoliant	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 32
a silicone	yes	no
amyl cinnamal	no	yes
benzyl alcohol	no	yes
benzyl salicylate	yes	no
calendula officinalis flower extract	no	yes
citric acid	yes	no
cocamide mea	yes	no
eucalyptus globulus leaf extract	no	yes
glycol distearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride	yes	no
hexyl cinnamal	yes	no
limonene	yes	no
linalool	yes	no
lycium barbarum fruit extract	yes	no
magnesium chloride	yes	no
magnesium nitrate	yes	no
methylparaben	yes	no
myrtus communis leaf extract	no	yes
oleic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
propylene glycol	no	yes
punica granatum bark extract	no	yes
rosa centifolia flower extract	no	yes
sls (a sulfate)	yes	no
sodium benzoate	yes	no
sodium citrate	yes	no
sodium hydroxide	yes	no
sodium lauroyl sarcosinate	no	yes
sodium xylenesulfonate	yes	no
trisodium ethylenediamine disuccinate	yes	no
water	yes	no
water	no	yes
zinc coceth sulfate	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Wella if you want BHA exfoliant in the formula.

Choose L'angelica if you want a comparable formula for $39.00 less.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.