[VT Cosmetics] Vitamin C Astaxanthin Mask 320g 30EA vs MEDIHEAL Derma Modeling Pack Vitamin Brightening

[VT Cosmetics] Vitamin C Astaxanthin Mask 320g 30EA and MEDIHEAL Derma Modeling Pack Vitamin Brightening share 20 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

• 
  [VT Cosmetics] Vitamin C Astaxanthin Mask 320g 30EA
• 
  MEDIHEAL Derma Modeling Pack Vitamin Brightening

Clear allAdd product2 of 8

Permalink for this comparison →

FitFormulaValueUse together

Full comparison

Loading product details…

Full ingredient comparisonLabels, evidence & retailer offers

How much do the ingredient lists overlap?

22%

Ingredients in every formula

20in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

6unique actives

Ingredient rows compared

93rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.

How do the ingredient lists differ?

93 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(73 of 93 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended VT Cosmetics [VT Cosmetics] Vitamin C Astaxanthin Mask 320g 30EA $29.60 $29.60 at Ballagrio ↗Save	Mediheal MEDIHEAL Derma Modeling Pack Vitamin Brightening $25.99 Reference price Save
Basics
Type & size	Mask · size not on the record	Mask · size not on the record
Brand origin	Korean	Korean
Offers
Where to buydiffers	$29.60 · Ballagrio	No offers listed
Availabilitydiffers	In stock	No offers listed
Formula
Key activesdiffers	niacinamide, ascorbic acid, panthenol, sodium ascorbyl phosphate, kojic acid, ascorbyl glucoside, allantoin, sodium hyaluronate, hyaluronic acid, ceramide np, retinyl palmitate	niacinamide, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate, ascorbic acid, alpha-arbutin, ceramide np, allantoin
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free	Not recorded
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	pregnancy cautionPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 63 ingredients	Partially captured — 50 of 72 label entries matched, some checks not run
Key actives · 6
alpha-arbutin Pregnancy: caution	no	yes
ascorbyl glucoside Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
kojic acid Pregnancy: caution	yes	no
retinyl palmitate Pregnancy: avoid Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
sodium ascorbyl phosphate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 67
3-o-ethyl ascorbic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
adenosine	yes	no
algin	no	yes
aminobutyric acid	no	yes
anthemis nobilis flower oil	no	yes
arginine	no	yes
astaxanthin	yes	no
betaine	no	yes
bisabolol	no	yes
calcium sulfate	no	yes
carbomer	no	yes
ceramide ap	yes	no
ceramide as	yes	no
ceramide eop	yes	no
ceramide ns	yes	no
cholesterol	yes	no
coptis chinensis root extract	yes	no
dextrin	no	yes
dimethylsilanol hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
disodium edta	no	yes
erythritol	yes	no
ethylhexylglycerin	yes	no
ferulic acid	yes	no
gardenia florida fruit extract	no	yes
glucose	no	yes
glyceryl arachidonate	yes	no
glyceryl glucoside	no	yes
glyceryl linoleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
hippophae rhamnoides water	no	yes
hydrogenated phosphatidylcholine	yes	no
hydrogenated polydecene	yes	no
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hydrolyzed sodium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hydroxyethyl urea	yes	no
hydroxypropyltrimonium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
isopentyldiol	yes	no
juniperus mexicana oil	no	yes
kaolin	no	yes
limonene	yes	no
methylpropanediol	yes	no
myrciaria dubia fruit extract	no	yes
pantolactone	no	yes
pantothenic acid	no	yes
pelargonium graveolens flower oil	no	yes
perilla frutescens leaf extract	no	yes
phytosphingosine	yes	no
phytosterols	no	yes
polyglyceryl-10 stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
potassium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
propanediol	no	yes
propylene glycol	yes	no
sodium acetylated hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
sodium benzoate	no	yes
sodium dehydroacetate	no	yes
sodium hyaluronate crosspolymer Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
sodium hyaluronate dimethylsilanol Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
sodium lauroyl glutamate	yes	no
stearic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
tetrasodium pyrophosphate	no	yes
tocopheryl acetate	yes	no
tremella fuciformis polysaccharide	no	yes
tromethamine	yes	no
ubiquinone	yes	no
vitamin e	yes	no
water	no	yes
xanthan gum	yes	no
xylitol	no	yes

Mediheal's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose VT Cosmetics if you want Sodium Ascorbyl Phosphate in the formula.

Choose Mediheal if you want Alpha-Arbutin in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

Related formula comparisons

More suggestions →

• VT CosmeticsVS[Arocell] Super Collagen Bubble Serum Mask 30g/90g
• MedihealVSAcnes Real Icy Soothing Mask (10 pieces)
• VT CosmeticsVSBiodance Hydro Cera-Nol Real Deep Mask Sheet 4P

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.