Essential storage keeps the site working. Optional cookies and tracking support analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools.
Either choice lets you browse. Change it anytime in the footer. Cookie details.
[VT Cosmetics] PDRN Reedle Shot Hair Ampoule 700dL 15ml and PUREGRAM Origin Booster Shot 300 Spicules Ampoule Tube Type 30ml share 27 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 27[VT Cosmetics] PDRN Reedle Shot Hair Ampoule 700dL 15ml only 27PUREGRAM Origin Booster Shot 300 Spicules Ampoule Tube Type 30ml only 17
Permalink for this comparison →
Loading product details…
38%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | Recommended ![]() Puregram PUREGRAM Origin Booster Shot 300 Spicules Ampoule Tube Type 30ml$12.87 | |
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Serum · size not on the record | Serum · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | Korean | Not recorded |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | No offers listed | No offers listed |
| Availability | No offers listed | No offers listed |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | centella asiatica extract, niacinamide, ceramide np, sodium hyaluronate | niacinamide, ceramide np, sodium hyaluronate, hyaluronic acid |
| Free ofdiffers | Not recorded | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | pregnancy cautionPore data not yet reviewed | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 54 of 81 label entries matched, some checks not run | Fully parsed · 44 ingredients |
Key actives · 2 | ||
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
Rest of the labels · 42 | ||
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
VT Cosmetics's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose VT Cosmetics if you want Cica in the formula.
Choose Puregram if you want a comparable formula for $35.73 less.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.