[The History of Whoo] Ultimate Recovery NAD Power Ampoule 20ml/30ml vs numbuzin No.9 NAD+ BIO Lifting-sil Essence (50ml / 1.69 fl oz)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended The History of Whoo [The History of Whoo] Ultimate Recovery NAD Power Ampoule 20ml/30ml $60.80 Save	numbuzin numbuzin No.9 NAD+ BIO Lifting-sil Essence (50ml / 1.69 fl oz) $12.75 Save
Basics
Type & size	Serum · size not on the record	Serum · size not on the record
Brand origindiffers	Not recorded	Korean
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Formula
Key activesdiffers	niacinamide, panthenol, allantoin, glycolic acid, sodium hyaluronate	niacinamide, sodium hyaluronate
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free	Not recorded
Heads-updiffers	photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 59 ingredients	Partially captured — 43 of 115 label entries matched, some checks not run
Key actives · 3
aha exfoliant	yes	no
allantoin	yes	no
pro-vitamin b5	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 63
acetyl dipeptide-1 cetyl ester	no	yes
adenosine triphosphate	no	yes
ammonium polyacryloyldimethyl taurate	yes	no
amodimethicone	yes	no
angelica gigas root extract	yes	no
arginine	yes	no
asparagus cochinchinensis root extract	yes	no
asparagus lucidus root extract	yes	no
benzyl benzoate	yes	no
bis-hydroxyethoxypropyl dimethicone	yes	no
bis-peg-18 methyl ether dimethyl silane	yes	no
butylene glycol	yes	no
cetearyl alcohol	no	yes
chlorhexidine	no	yes
citric acid	yes	no
citronellol	yes	no
cornus officinalis fruit extract	yes	no
dimethicone crosspolymer	no	yes
dipeptide diaminobutyroyl benzylamide diacetate	no	yes
dipropylene glycol	yes	no
disodium edta	yes	no
empetrum nigrum fruit juice	yes	no
fragrance	yes	no
geraniol	yes	no
glutathione	no	yes
glyceryl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
glycoproteins	yes	no
haematococcus pluvialis oil	no	yes
hesperidin methyl chalcone	no	yes
hydrogenated vegetable oil	no	yes
hydroxycitronellal	yes	no
hydroxyethylcellulose	no	yes
hydroxypropyl cyclodextrin	no	yes
lactobacillus	yes	no
limonene	yes	no
linalool	yes	no
maltodextrin	yes	no
methylpropanediol	no	yes
mica	yes	no
nicotinamide mononucleotide Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
palmitic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
peg-11 methyl ether dimethicone	yes	no
pentaerythrityl tetraethylhexanoate	no	yes
phytosterols	yes	no
polyglyceryl-3 methylglucose distearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
potassium hydroxide	no	yes
potassium sorbate	yes	no
propanediol	no	yes
quercetin	yes	no
resveratrol	no	yes
sodium citrate	yes	no
sodium hydroxide	yes	no
sodium phytate	no	yes
sodium polyacrylate	no	yes
sodium stearoyl glutamate	yes	no
sorbitan laurate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
sorbitan oleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
sorbitan stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
stearic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
succinic acid	yes	no
trehalose	yes	no
trisodium edta	yes	no
tromethamine	no	yes

numbuzin's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.