[The History of Whoo] Ultimate Recovery NAD Power Ampoule 20ml/30ml vs LG Pra.L Glasslike Triple Toning Shot Ampoule 50ml

[The History of Whoo] Ultimate Recovery NAD Power Ampoule 20ml/30ml and LG Pra.L Glasslike Triple Toning Shot Ampoule 50ml share 11 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

• 
  [The History of Whoo] Ultimate Recovery NAD Power Ampoule 20ml/30ml
• 
  LG Pra.L Glasslike Triple Toning Shot Ampoule 50ml

Clear allAdd product2 of 8

Permalink for this comparison →

FitFormulaValueUse together

Full comparison

Loading product details…

Full ingredient comparisonLabels, evidence & retailer offers

How much do the ingredient lists overlap?

15%

Ingredients in every formula

11in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

2unique actives

Ingredient rows compared

73rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.

How do the ingredient lists differ?

73 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(62 of 73 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended The History of Whoo [The History of Whoo] Ultimate Recovery NAD Power Ampoule 20ml/30ml $60.80 Reference price Save	LG Pra.L LG Pra.L Glasslike Triple Toning Shot Ampoule 50ml $58.01 Reference price Save
Basics
Type & size	Serum · size not on the record	Serum · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	No offers listed	No offers listed
Availability	No offers listed	No offers listed
Formula
Key activesdiffers	niacinamide, panthenol, allantoin, glycolic acid, sodium hyaluronate	niacinamide, allantoin, sodium hyaluronate
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free	Not recorded
Heads-updiffers	photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 59 ingredients	Partially captured — 25 of 34 label entries matched, some checks not run
Key actives · 2
aha exfoliant	yes	no
pro-vitamin b5	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 60
1,2-hexanediol	yes	no
a silicone	yes	no
adenosine	yes	no
ammonium polyacryloyldimethyl taurate	yes	no
amodimethicone	yes	no
angelica gigas root extract	yes	no
asparagus cochinchinensis root extract	yes	no
asparagus lucidus root extract	yes	no
benzyl benzoate	yes	no
beta-glucan	yes	no
bis-hydroxyethoxypropyl dimethicone	yes	no
bis-peg-18 methyl ether dimethyl silane	yes	no
bisabolol	no	yes
carnitine	no	yes
cetearyl alcohol	no	yes
cholesterol	yes	no
citronellol	yes	no
cornus officinalis fruit extract	yes	no
diphenylsiloxy phenyl trimethicone	no	yes
dipotassium glycyrrhizate	no	yes
dipropylene glycol	yes	no
empetrum nigrum fruit juice	yes	no
ethylhexylglycerin	yes	no
fragrance	yes	no
geraniol	yes	no
glutamic acid	no	yes
glycoproteins	yes	no
hippophae rhamnoides oil	no	yes
hydrogenated lecithin	yes	no
hydroxycitronellal	yes	no
isopropyl palmitate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
juniperus mexicana oil	no	yes
lactobacillus	yes	no
limonene	yes	no
linalool	yes	no
maltodextrin	yes	no
mica	yes	no
nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
nicotinamide mononucleotide Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
peg-11 methyl ether dimethicone	yes	no
pentylene glycol	yes	no
phytosterols	yes	no
potassium hydroxide	no	yes
potassium sorbate	yes	no
propanediol	no	yes
quercetin	yes	no
saccharomyces Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
serine	no	yes
shea butter	no	yes
sodium citrate	yes	no
sodium hydroxide	yes	no
sodium lactate	yes	no
sorbitan oleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
sorbitan stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
succinic acid	yes	no
trehalose	yes	no
tributyl citrate	no	yes
trisodium edta	yes	no
vitamin e	yes	no
xanthan gum	yes	no

LG Pra.L's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose The History of Whoo if you want Pro-vitamin B5 in the formula.

Choose LG Pra.L if you want a comparable formula for $2.79 less.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

Related formula comparisons

More suggestions →

• The History of WhooVSTHE WHOO Bichup Self-Generating Anti-Aging Essence 50ml
• LG Pra.LVSDr.Althea Multi Action Infusion Serum 30ml
• The History of WhooVS[DERMATORY] Nia Shot+ IPMP Black Serum 30ml

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.