Essential storage keeps sign-in, your bag and requested features working. With your permission, optional analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools help us understand and improve the site.
You can use the site without optional tracking and change your choice from the footer. Read the cookie details.
[The History of Whoo] Cheongidan Pro-Radiance Balancing Toner 150ml and Olaplex No.4P Blonde Enhancer Toning Shampoo - 1000 ml share 7 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 7[The History of Whoo] Cheongidan Pro-Radiance Balancing Toner 150ml only 47Olaplex No.4P Blonde Enhancer Toning Shampoo - 1000 ml only 10
Permalink for this comparison →
Loading product details…
11%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | Recommended ![]() The History of Whoo [The History of Whoo] Cheongidan Pro-Radiance Balancing Toner 150ml$106.10 | |
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Toner · size not on the record | Toner · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | Not recorded | American |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $106.10 · Ballagrio | No offers listed |
| Availabilitydiffers | In stock | No offers listed |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate | Not recorded |
| Free ofdiffers | Not recorded | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-up | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 54 of 141 label entries matched, some checks not run | Fully parsed · 17 ingredients |
Key actives · 3 | ||
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
Rest of the labels · 54 | ||
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
The History of Whoo's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.