Essential storage keeps the site working. Optional cookies and tracking support analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools.
Either choice lets you browse. Change it anytime in the footer. Cookie details.
[The History of Whoo] Cheongidan Pro-Radiance Balancing Toner 150ml and Sooryehan Toner 2X 150ml + 100ml share 15 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 15[The History of Whoo] Cheongidan Pro-Radiance Balancing Toner 150ml only 39Sooryehan Toner 2X 150ml + 100ml only 19
Permalink for this comparison →
Loading product details…
21%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | Recommended ![]() The History of Whoo [The History of Whoo] Cheongidan Pro-Radiance Balancing Toner 150ml$106.10 | |
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Toner · size not on the record | Toner · size not on the record |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $106.10 · Ballagrio | No offers listed |
| Availabilitydiffers | In stock | No offers listed |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate | panthenol |
| Free of | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Heads-up | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 54 of 141 label entries matched, some checks not run | Partially captured — 34 of 54 label entries matched, some checks not run |
Key actives · 2 | ||
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
Rest of the labels · 56 | ||
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
The History of Whoo and Sooryehan have labels only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose The History of Whoo if you want Vitamin B3 in the formula.
Choose Sooryehan if you want a comparable formula for $75.06 less.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.