SUNGBOON EDITOR Green Tomato NMN Pore Lifting Ampoule 75ml vs [The History of Whoo] Ultimate Recovery NAD Power Ampoule 20ml/30ml

SUNGBOON EDITOR Green Tomato NMN Pore Lifting Ampoule 75ml and [The History of Whoo] Ultimate Recovery NAD Power Ampoule 20ml/30ml share 21 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

• 
  SUNGBOON EDITOR Green Tomato NMN Pore Lifting Ampoule 75ml
• 
  [The History of Whoo] Ultimate Recovery NAD Power Ampoule 20ml/30ml

Clear allAdd product2 of 8

Permalink for this comparison →

FitFormulaValueUse together

Full comparison

Loading product details…

Full ingredient comparisonLabels, evidence & retailer offers

How much do the ingredient lists overlap?

20%

Ingredients in every formula

21in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

3unique actives

Ingredient rows compared

105rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

How do the ingredient lists differ?

105 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(84 of 105 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Sungboon Editor SUNGBOON EDITOR Green Tomato NMN Pore Lifting Ampoule 75ml $29.90 Reference price Save	The History of Whoo [The History of Whoo] Ultimate Recovery NAD Power Ampoule 20ml/30ml $60.80 Reference price Save
Basics
Type & size	Serum · size not on the record	Serum · size not on the record
Brand origindiffers	Korean	Not recorded
Offers
Where to buy	No offers listed	No offers listed
Availability	No offers listed	No offers listed
Formula
Key activesdiffers	niacinamide, allantoin, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate, hyaluronic acid, ceramide np	niacinamide, panthenol, allantoin, glycolic acid, sodium hyaluronate
Free ofdiffers	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free
Heads-updiffers	fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 67 ingredients	Fully parsed · 59 ingredients
Key actives · 3
aha exfoliant	no	yes
ceramide np	yes	no
hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 81
2-t-butylcyclohexyl acetate	yes	no
2,4-dimethyl-3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde	yes	no
3-hexenol	yes	no
a silicone	no	yes
adenosine triphosphate	yes	no
ammonium polyacryloyldimethyl taurate	no	yes
amodimethicone	no	yes
anemarrhena asphodeloides root extract	yes	no
angelica gigas root extract	no	yes
arginine	no	yes
asparagus cochinchinensis root extract	no	yes
asparagus lucidus root extract	no	yes
benzyl benzoate	no	yes
benzyl glycol	yes	no
beta-glucan	no	yes
bis-hydroxyethoxypropyl dimethicone	no	yes
bis-peg-18 methyl ether dimethyl silane	no	yes
citric acid	no	yes
citronellol	no	yes
collagen extract	yes	no
cornus officinalis fruit extract	no	yes
dextrin	yes	no
dipotassium glycyrrhizate	yes	no
disodium phosphate	yes	no
empetrum nigrum fruit juice	no	yes
ethyl linalool	yes	no
ethylene brassylate	yes	no
eucalyptol	yes	no
fibronectin	yes	no
fragrance	no	yes
gardenia florida fruit extract	yes	no
geraniol	no	yes
gluconolactone	yes	no
glycoproteins	no	yes
glycosaminoglycans	yes	no
hexenyl acetate	yes	no
hydrogenated polyisobutene	yes	no
hydrolyzed collagen	yes	no
hydrolyzed elastin	yes	no
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hydrolyzed vegetable protein	yes	no
hydroxycitronellal	no	yes
hydroxypropyltrimonium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
lactobacillus	no	yes
limonene	no	yes
linalool	no	yes
linalyl acetate	yes	no
lycopene	yes	no
lysolecithin	yes	no
maltodextrin	no	yes
methyldihydrojasmonate	yes	no
methylenedioxyphenyl methylpropanal	yes	no
mica	no	yes
oleic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
peg-11 methyl ether dimethicone	no	yes
pentylene glycol	no	yes
phenethyl alcohol	yes	no
phenyl trimethicone	yes	no
phytosterols	no	yes
pinus palustris leaf extract	yes	no
polyglyceryl-10 laurate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
potassium chloride	yes	no
potassium phosphate	yes	no
potassium sorbate	no	yes
pueraria lobata root extract	yes	no
quercetin	no	yes
raspberry ketone	yes	no
saccharomyces Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
sodium chloride	yes	no
sodium hyaluronate crosspolymer Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
sodium hydroxide	no	yes
sodium lactate	no	yes
sodium stearoyl glutamate	no	yes
soluble proteoglycan	yes	no
sorbitan oleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
sorbitan stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
succinic acid	no	yes
trisodium edta	no	yes
tromethamine	yes	no
ulmus davidiana root extract	yes	no
xylitol	yes	no

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Sungboon Editor if you want Ceramide Np in the formula.

Choose The History of Whoo if you want AHA exfoliant in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

Related formula comparisons

More suggestions →

• Sungboon EditorVS[Arocell] Super Collagen Sun Essence SPF 50+ PA++++ 30ml
• The History of WhooVSTHE WHOO Bichup Self-Generating Anti-Aging Essence 50ml
• Sungboon EditorVSeasydew EGFx Downtime Serum 40ml

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.