SUNGBOON EDITOR Green Tomato Deep Pore Cleansing Ultra Whipping Foam 120g vs The SAEM Urban Eco Golden Berry C Cleansing Foam 150ml

SUNGBOON EDITOR Green Tomato Deep Pore Cleansing Ultra Whipping Foam 120g and The SAEM Urban Eco Golden Berry C Cleansing Foam 150ml share 19 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

• 
  SUNGBOON EDITOR Green Tomato Deep Pore Cleansing Ultra Whipping Foam 120g
• 
  The SAEM Urban Eco Golden Berry C Cleansing Foam 150ml

Clear allAdd product2 of 8

Permalink for this comparison →

FitFormulaValueUse together

Full comparison

Loading product details…

Full ingredient comparisonLabels, evidence & retailer offers

How much do the ingredient lists overlap?

20%

Ingredients in every formula

19in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

6unique actives

Ingredient rows compared

95rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

How do the ingredient lists differ?

95 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(76 of 95 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Sungboon Editor SUNGBOON EDITOR Green Tomato Deep Pore Cleansing Ultra Whipping Foam 120g $20.00 Reference price Save	The SAEM The SAEM Urban Eco Golden Berry C Cleansing Foam 150ml $26.00 Reference price Save
Basics
Type & size	Cleanser · size not on the record	Cleanser · size not on the record
Brand origin	Korean	Korean
Offers
Where to buy	No offers listed	No offers listed
Availability	No offers listed	No offers listed
Formula
Key activesdiffers	salicylic acid, sodium hyaluronate, hyaluronic acid, squalane, ceramide np, panthenol	sodium hyaluronate, ascorbic acid, hyaluronic acid, panthenol, sodium ascorbyl phosphate, retinyl palmitate
Free ofdiffers	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free
Heads-up	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 59 ingredients	Fully parsed · 55 ingredients
Key actives · 6
bha exfoliant	yes	no
ceramide np	yes	no
retinyl palmitate Pregnancy: avoid Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
sodium ascorbyl phosphate Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
squalane	yes	no
vitamin c	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 70
alanine	yes	no
arachidic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
arginine	yes	no
ascorbyl tetraisopalmitate Pregnancy: generally fine Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
aspartic acid	yes	no
atelocollagen	yes	no
benzyl glycol	no	yes
biotin	no	yes
butter	yes	no
cetearyl olivate	yes	no
chlorphenesin	no	yes
cholesterol	yes	no
citric acid	yes	no
cocamide methyl mea	no	yes
cocamidopropyl betaine	no	yes
cocoyl hydrolyzed collagen	yes	no
collagen extract	yes	no
coptis japonica root extract	no	yes
cyanocobalamin	no	yes
cysteine	yes	no
desamido collagen	yes	no
disodium edta	no	yes
ethylhexylglycerin	no	yes
folic acid	no	yes
fragrance	no	yes
glutamic acid	yes	no
glutathione	no	yes
glyceryl arachidonate	no	yes
glyceryl linolenate	no	yes
glyceryl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
glyceryl stearate se Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
glycine	yes	no
histidine	yes	no
hydrolyzed collagen	yes	no
hydrolyzed glycosaminoglycans	no	yes
hydrolyzed sodium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
isoleucine	yes	no
kaolin	no	yes
lauryl hydroxysultaine	yes	no
leucine	yes	no
lysine	yes	no
methionine	yes	no
peg-100 stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
peg-90m	no	yes
phenoxyethanol	no	yes
phenylalanine	yes	no
physalis peruviana extract	no	yes
phytosphingosine	yes	no
pinus palustris leaf extract	yes	no
polyglyceryl-10 stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
potassium cocoyl glycinate	no	yes
potassium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
procollagen	yes	no
proline	yes	no
propanediol	no	yes
pueraria lobata root extract	yes	no
pyridoxine	no	yes
rheum palmatum root extract	no	yes
serine	yes	no
sodium benzoate	no	yes
soluble collagen	yes	no
sophora flavescens root extract	no	yes
thiamine hcl	no	yes
threonine	yes	no
tocopheryl acetate	no	yes
tyrosine	yes	no
ulmus davidiana root extract	yes	no
valine	yes	no
volcanic ash	no	yes
xanthium strumarium fruit extract	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Sungboon Editor if you want BHA exfoliant in the formula.

Choose The SAEM if you want Vitamin C in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

Related formula comparisons

More suggestions →

• Sungboon EditorVSSOME BY MI, Lacto Soy, Enzyme Deep Cleansing Foam, 3.38 fl oz (100 ml)
• The SAEMVSSOME BY MI, Yuja Niacin, Brightening All-In-One Cleanser, 3.38 fl oz (100 ml)
• Sungboon EditorVSDr.G pH Cleansing Red Blemish Clear Soothing Foam 150ml

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.