numbuzin No.3 Porcelain Base-skip Tone Up Beige SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml (2 Types) vs [AHC] Masters Tone Up Sun Serum SPF 50+ PA++++ 50ml

numbuzin No.3 Porcelain Base-skip Tone Up Beige SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml (2 Types) and [AHC] Masters Tone Up Sun Serum SPF 50+ PA++++ 50ml share 20 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

• numbuzin — numbuzin No.3 Porcelain Base-skip Tone Up Beige SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml (2 Types)
  numbuzin No.3 Porcelain Base-skip Tone Up Beige SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml (2 Types)
• 
  [AHC] Masters Tone Up Sun Serum SPF 50+ PA++++ 50ml

Clear allAdd product2 of 8

Permalink for this comparison →

FitFormulaValueUse together

Full comparison

Loading product details…

Full ingredient comparisonLabels, evidence & retailer offers

How much do the ingredient lists overlap?

24%

Ingredients in every formula

20in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

6unique actives

Ingredient rows compared

83rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.

How do the ingredient lists differ?

83 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(63 of 83 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	shot numbuzin numbuzin No.3 Porcelain Base-skip Tone Up Beige SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml (2 Types) $14.16 Reference price Save	Recommended Ahc [AHC] Masters Tone Up Sun Serum SPF 50+ PA++++ 50ml $20.61 $20.61 at Ballagrio ↗Save
Basics
Type & size	Sunscreen · size not on the record	Sunscreen · size not on the record
Brand origindiffers	Korean	Not recorded
Offers
Where to buydiffers	No offers listed	$20.61 · Ballagrio
Availabilitydiffers	No offers listed	In stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, niacinamide, centella asiatica extract	zinc oxide, niacinamide, titanium dioxide, ceramide np, sodium hyaluronate, panthenol, hyaluronic acid, ascorbic acid
Free of	Not recorded	Not recorded
Heads-up	None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed	None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Partially captured — 34 of 59 label entries matched, some checks not run	Partially captured — 69 of 137 label entries matched, some checks not run
Key actives · 6
ceramide np	no	yes
cica	yes	no
hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
hyaluronic acid (salt form) Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
pro-vitamin b5	no	yes
vitamin c	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 57
1,2-hexanediol	yes	no
a silicone	no	yes
adenosine	no	yes
arginine	no	yes
artemisia capillaris extract	yes	no
ascorbyl tetraisopalmitate Pregnancy: generally fine Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
bamboo vinegar	no	yes
c9-12 alkane	no	yes
caesalpinia spinosa fruit extract	no	yes
calcium carbonate	no	yes
camellia sinensis leaf extract	yes	no
caprylyl glycol	yes	no
carbomer	no	yes
chitosan	no	yes
cholesterol	no	yes
ci 77491	no	yes
ci 77492	no	yes
cyclohexasiloxane	yes	no
cystine	no	yes
dicaprylyl carbonate	yes	no
dimethiconol	no	yes
diphenylsiloxy phenyl trimethicone	no	yes
dipropylene glycol	no	yes
disiloxane	yes	no
erythritol	no	yes
ethylhexyl methoxycrylene	no	yes
fragrance	no	yes
glutamine	no	yes
glycerin	no	yes
glyceryl caprylate	yes	no
glycine	no	yes
hippophae rhamnoides fruit extract	no	yes
houttuynia cordata extract	yes	no
hydrogenated lecithin	no	yes
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
hydrolyzed sodium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
hydroxypropyltrimonium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
isododecane	no	yes
kappaphycus alvarezii extract	no	yes
methyl trimethicone	no	yes
methylpropanediol	no	yes
mica	yes	no
octyldodecanol	no	yes
polyglyceryl-10 laurate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
polyglyceryl-4 isostearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
polygonum cuspidatum root extract	yes	no
polymethylsilsesquioxane	yes	no
potassium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
saccharomyces ferment filtrate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
scutellaria baicalensis root extract	yes	no
sodium acetylated hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
sodium hyaluronate crosspolymer Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
sorbitol	no	yes
stearic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
trisiloxane	no	yes
trisodium ethylenediamine disuccinate	no	yes
water	no	yes

numbuzin and Ahc have labels only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose numbuzin if you want Cica in the formula.

Choose Ahc if you want Ceramide Np in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

Related formula comparisons

More suggestions →

• numbuzinVSTorriden Balanceful Cica Tone Up Sun Cream 60ml (SPF 50+ PA++++)
• AhcVSMEDI-PEEL Mooltox Hyaluronic Acid Mild Tone Up Sun Cream SPF 50+ PA++++ 50g
• numbuzinVSSKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Velvet Finish Sunscreen SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.