SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Velvet Finish Sunscreen SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml and numbuzin No.3 Porcelain Base-skip Tone Up Beige SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml (2 Types) share 22 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 22SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Poremizing Velvet Finish Sunscreen SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml only 28numbuzin No.3 Porcelain Base-skip Tone Up Beige SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml (2 Types) only 12
Permalink for this comparison →
35%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | Recommended numbuzin numbuzin No.3 Porcelain Base-skip Tone Up Beige SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml (2 Types)$14.16 | |
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Sunscreen · size not on the record | Sunscreen · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $19.80 · Dodoskin | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key actives | zinc oxide, niacinamide, titanium dioxide, centella asiatica extract | zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, niacinamide, centella asiatica extract |
| Free ofdiffers | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free | Not recorded |
| Heads-updiffers | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 50 ingredients | Partially captured — 34 of 59 label entries matched, some checks not run |
Rest of the labels · 40 | ||
a silicone | yes | no |
adenosine | yes | no |
aloe barbadensis leaf extract | yes | no |
artemisia capillaris extract | no | yes |
bombax malabaricum flower extract | yes | no |
c12-15 alkyl benzoate | yes | no |
c9-12 alkane | yes | no |
camellia sinensis leaf extract | no | yes |
ci 77491 | yes | no |
ci 77492 | yes | no |
ci 77499 | yes | no |
cyclohexasiloxane | no | yes |
dibutyl adipate | yes | no |
dicaprylyl carbonate | no | yes |
dicaprylyl ether | yes | no |
dimethiconol | yes | no |
dipropylene glycol | yes | no |
disiloxane | no | yes |
echium plantagineum seed oil | yes | no |
glycerin | yes | no |
houttuynia cordata extract | no | yes |
methyl trimethicone | yes | no |
mica | no | yes |
neopentyl glycol diethylhexanoate | yes | no |
octyldodecanol | yes | no |
pentylene glycol | no | yes |
poly c10-30 alkyl acrylate | yes | no |
polygonum cuspidatum root extract | no | yes |
polyhydroxystearic acid | yes | no |
polymethyl methacrylate | yes | no |
polymethylsilsesquioxane | no | yes |
saccharomyces ferment filtrate | yes | no |
scutellaria baicalensis root extract | no | yes |
sea salt | yes | no |
silica | yes | no |
sodium potassium aluminum silicate | yes | no |
trimethylsiloxysilicate | no | yes |
trisiloxane | yes | no |
vinyl dimethicone | yes | no |
water | yes | no |
numbuzin's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose SKIN1004 if you want this formula as listed.
Choose numbuzin if you want a comparable formula for $0.69 less.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.