Nioxin Skin Revitalizer for fine, colored and slightly thinning hair System 3 (Revitalizing conditioner for scalp, fine, normal and thinning, chemical and Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml share 11 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 11Nioxin Skin Revitalizer for fine, colored and slightly thinning hair System 3 (Revitalizing conditioner for scalp, fine, normal and thinning, chemical only 13Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml only 31
Permalink for this comparison →
20%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Conditioner · size not on the record | Conditioner · size not on the record |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Availability | in stock | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | panthenol | panthenol, lactic acid |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, silicone-free | sulfate-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 24 ingredients | Fully parsed · 42 ingredients |
Key actives · 1 | ||
aha exfoliant (gentle) | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 43 | ||
aleurites moluccanus seed oil | yes | no |
alpha-isomethyl ionone | no | yes |
amodimethicone | no | yes |
ascorbyl palmitate | no | yes |
behentrimonium chloride | yes | no |
benzyl alcohol | yes | no |
benzyl salicylate | no | yes |
bht | no | yes |
biotin | yes | no |
butylparaben | no | yes |
cetearyl alcohol | no | yes |
citral | no | yes |
citric acid | no | yes |
citronellol | no | yes |
coumarin | no | yes |
disodium edta | no | yes |
drying alcohol | no | yes |
edta | yes | no |
ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate | no | yes |
ethylparaben | no | yes |
faex extract | yes | no |
fragrance | no | yes |
geraniol | no | yes |
glycerin | no | yes |
guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride | no | yes |
hexyl cinnamal | no | yes |
hydrolyzed silk | yes | no |
hydroxyethylcellulose | no | yes |
imidazolidinyl urea | no | yes |
isopropyl alcohol | yes | no |
lecithin | yes | no |
linalool | no | yes |
lycium barbarum fruit extract | no | yes |
maltodextrin | yes | no |
mentha arvensis leaf oil | yes | no |
oleic acid | no | yes |
orbignya oleifera seed oil | no | yes |
pvp | no | yes |
stearalkonium chloride | no | yes |
stearyl alcohol | yes | no |
tetrasodium edta | no | yes |
vaccinium myrtillus leaf extract | yes | no |
vitamin e | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Nioxin if you avoid fragrance.
Choose Wella if you want AHA exfoliant (gentle) in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.