Shampooing extra doux Camomille & Germes de blé cheveux blonds vs Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml
Shampooing extra doux Camomille & Germes de blé cheveux blonds and Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml share 12 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 12Shampooing extra doux Camomille & Germes de blé cheveux blonds only 9Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml only 21
Permalink for this comparison →
Shared formula
29%
- Ingredients in every formula
- 12in both formulas
- Key actives unique to one formula
- 2unique actives
- Ingredient rows compared
- 42rows compared
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
The formulas, row by row
42 ingredients across 2 labels| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Shampoo · size not on the record | Shampoo · size not on the record |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Availabilitydiffers | Not recorded | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | panthenol | panthenol, salicylic acid, lactic acid |
| Free ofdiffers | alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | alcohol-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 21 ingredients | Fully parsed · 33 ingredients |
Key actives · 2 | ||
aha exfoliant (gentle) | no | yes |
bha exfoliant | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 28 | ||
2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol | yes | no |
a silicone | no | yes |
bisabolol | yes | no |
cocamide mea | no | yes |
disodium cocoamphodiacetate | yes | no |
eugenol | yes | no |
glycol distearate | no | yes |
guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride | no | yes |
hexyl cinnamal | no | yes |
limonene | no | yes |
lycium barbarum fruit extract | no | yes |
magnesium chloride | no | yes |
magnesium nitrate | no | yes |
methylchloroisothiazolinone | no | yes |
methylisothiazolinone | no | yes |
methylparaben | no | yes |
oleic acid | no | yes |
pantolactone | yes | no |
peg-40 hydrogenated castor oil | yes | no |
peg-60 almond glycerides | yes | no |
sls (a sulfate) | no | yes |
sodium citrate | no | yes |
sodium hydroxide | no | yes |
sodium xylenesulfonate | no | yes |
trisodium ethylenediamine disuccinate | no | yes |
triticum vulgare germ extract | yes | no |
water | yes | no |
water | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
The bottom line
Choose Netto if you want this formula as listed.
Choose Wella if you want BHA exfoliant in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Focus on an effect
People also compare
- NettoShampooing volumateur
- WellaVisible repair shampoo Londa 1000ml
- NettoSyoss Shampooing perfecteur Kératine Perfection
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.