Essential storage keeps sign-in, your bag and requested features working. With your permission, optional analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools help us understand and improve the site.
You can use the site without optional tracking and change your choice from the footer. Read the cookie details.
LANEIGE Water Bank Blue Hyaluronic Intensive Cream 20ml and VT COSMETICS Retinal Pro Cream 0.025 20ml share 21 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 21LANEIGE Water Bank Blue Hyaluronic Intensive Cream 20ml only 19VT COSMETICS Retinal Pro Cream 0.025 20ml only 36
Permalink for this comparison →
Loading product details…
28%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Moisturizer · size not on the record | Moisturizer · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | No offers listed | No offers listed |
| Availability | No offers listed | No offers listed |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | squalane, niacinamide, ceramide np, sodium hyaluronate, hyaluronic acid | niacinamide, panthenol, retinal, squalane, centella asiatica extract, sodium hyaluronate, ceramide np, hyaluronic acid |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 40 ingredients | Fully parsed · 57 ingredients |
Key actives · 3 | ||
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
Rest of the labels · 52 | ||
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Laneige if you want a comparable formula for $8.75 less.
Choose VT Cosmetics if you want Pro-vitamin B5 in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.