Huxley Re-bouncing Toner Hydro Shade 200ml vs EQQUALBERRY Aloe PDRN Calming Toner 5.07 fl. oz.(150ml)
Huxley Re-bouncing Toner Hydro Shade 200ml and EQQUALBERRY Aloe PDRN Calming Toner 5.07 fl. oz.(150ml) share 11 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 11Huxley Re-bouncing Toner Hydro Shade 200ml only 5EQQUALBERRY Aloe PDRN Calming Toner 5.07 fl. oz.(150ml) only 25
Permalink for this comparison →
Shared formula
27%
- Ingredients in every formula
- 11in both formulas
- Key actives unique to one formula
- 3unique actives
- Ingredient rows compared
- 41rows compared
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
The formulas, row by row
41 ingredients across 2 labels| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & sizediffers | Toner · size not on the record | Toner · 5.07 fl. oz |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Availabilitydiffers | Not recorded | InStock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, sodium hyaluronate, panthenol | niacinamide, centella asiatica extract, panthenol, allantoin |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 16 ingredients | Fully parsed · 36 ingredients |
Key actives · 3 | ||
allantoin | no | yes |
cica | no | yes |
hyaluronic acid (salt form) | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 27 | ||
aloe barbadensis leaf extract | no | yes |
aloe barbadensis leaf water | no | yes |
althaea rosea flower extract | no | yes |
asiatic acid | no | yes |
asiaticoside | no | yes |
beta-glucan | no | yes |
butylene glycol | no | yes |
camellia sinensis leaf extract | no | yes |
centella asiatica leaf extract | no | yes |
centella asiatica root extract | no | yes |
chondrus crispus extract | no | yes |
citric acid | no | yes |
coptis japonica root extract | no | yes |
cynanchum atratum extract | no | yes |
dextrin | no | yes |
fragrance | yes | no |
gardenia florida fruit extract | no | yes |
madecassic acid | no | yes |
madecassoside | no | yes |
malachite extract | no | yes |
opuntia ficus-indica seed oil | yes | no |
opuntia ficus-indica stem extract | yes | no |
pentylene glycol | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-10 laurate | yes | no |
sambucus nigra fruit extract | no | yes |
sodium citrate | no | yes |
water | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
The bottom line
Choose Huxley if you want this formula as listed.
Choose Eqqualberry if you want Cica in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Focus on an effect
People also compare
- HuxleyHuxley Re-bouncing Cream Hydro Shade 50ml
- EqqualberryTIRTIR Match Skin Toner 150ml
- HuxleyHuxley Re-bouncing Serum Hydro Shade 50ml
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.