Essential storage keeps sign-in, your bag and requested features working. With your permission, optional analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools help us understand and improve the site.
You can use the site without optional tracking and change your choice from the footer. Read the cookie details.
[HERA] Homme Black Active Advanced Toner Special and [The History of Whoo] Cheongidan Pro-Radiance Balancing Toner 150ml share 15 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 15[HERA] Homme Black Active Advanced Toner Special only 16[The History of Whoo] Cheongidan Pro-Radiance Balancing Toner 150ml only 39
Permalink for this comparison →
Loading product details…
21%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | Recommended ![]() The History of Whoo [The History of Whoo] Cheongidan Pro-Radiance Balancing Toner 150ml$106.10 | |
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Toner · size not on the record | Toner · size not on the record |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $81.50 · Ballagrio | $106.10 · Ballagrio |
| Availability | In stock | In stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide | niacinamide, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate |
| Free of | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Heads-up | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 31 of 44 label entries matched, some checks not run | Partially captured — 54 of 141 label entries matched, some checks not run |
Key actives · 2 | ||
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
Rest of the labels · 53 | ||
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
Hera and The History of Whoo have labels only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Hera if you want a comparable formula for $24.60 less.
Choose The History of Whoo if you want Pro-vitamin B5 in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.