Anti-roos shampoo + conditioner vs Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml
Anti-roos shampoo + conditioner and Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml share 18 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 18Anti-roos shampoo + conditioner only 10Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml only 15
Permalink for this comparison →
Shared formula
42%
- Ingredients in every formula
- 18in both formulas
- Key actives unique to one formula
- 3unique actives
- Ingredient rows compared
- 43rows compared
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
The formulas, row by row
43 ingredients across 2 labels| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Shampoo · size not on the record | Shampoo · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | American | Not recorded |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Availabilitydiffers | Not recorded | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | piroctone olamine, panthenol | panthenol, salicylic acid, lactic acid |
| Free ofdiffers | alcohol-free, paraben-free | alcohol-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 28 ingredients | Fully parsed · 33 ingredients |
Key actives · 3 | ||
aha exfoliant (gentle) | no | yes |
bha exfoliant | no | yes |
piroctone olamine | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 22 | ||
ci 42090 | yes | no |
citrus limon fruit extract | yes | no |
cocamide mea | no | yes |
glycerin | no | yes |
linalool | no | yes |
lycium barbarum fruit extract | no | yes |
magnesium chloride | no | yes |
magnesium nitrate | no | yes |
menthol | yes | no |
methylchloroisothiazolinone | no | yes |
methylisothiazolinone | no | yes |
methylparaben | no | yes |
oleic acid | no | yes |
potassium sorbate | no | yes |
propylene glycol | yes | no |
sodium salicylate | yes | no |
tea-dodecylbenzenesulfonate | yes | no |
tocopheryl acetate | yes | no |
triethylene glycol | yes | no |
trisodium ethylenediamine disuccinate | no | yes |
water | yes | no |
water | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
The bottom line
Choose Head & Shoulders if you want Piroctone Olamine in the formula.
Choose Wella if you want BHA exfoliant in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Focus on an effect
People also compare
- Head & ShouldersAnti-dandruff shampoo repair & care
- WellaVisible repair shampoo Londa 1000ml
- Head & ShouldersClassic Clean Anti-dandruff Shampoo
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.