Mizellen and Cils démasq share 5 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 5Mizellen only 5Cils démasq only 6
Permalink for this comparison →
31%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Cleanser · size not on the record | Cleanser · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | European | Not recorded |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key actives | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Free ofdiffers | Not recorded | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 10 of 16 label entries matched, some checks not run | Fully parsed · 11 ingredients |
Rest of the labels · 11 | ||
ci 60725 | yes | no |
ci 61565 | no | yes |
decyl glucoside | no | yes |
fragrance | yes | no |
haematococcus pluvialis extract | yes | no |
linalool | yes | no |
polyaminopropyl biguanide | no | yes |
potassium phosphate | no | yes |
sodium chloride | no | yes |
water | yes | no |
water | no | yes |
Garnier's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Garnier if you want this formula as listed.
Choose Maybelline New York if you avoid fragrance.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.