[d'Alba] Serum Glow Tension Cover Cushion SPF 50+ PA++++ 17g vs [MISSHA] M Perfect Cover Serum BB Cream PRO SPF 50+ PA ++++ 50ml

[d'Alba] Serum Glow Tension Cover Cushion SPF 50+ PA++++ 17g and [MISSHA] M Perfect Cover Serum BB Cream PRO SPF 50+ PA ++++ 50ml share 19 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

• 
  [d'Alba] Serum Glow Tension Cover Cushion SPF 50+ PA++++ 17g
• 
  [MISSHA] M Perfect Cover Serum BB Cream PRO SPF 50+ PA ++++ 50ml

Clear allAdd product2 of 8

Permalink for this comparison →

FitFormulaValueUse together

Full comparison

Loading product details…

Full ingredient comparisonLabels, evidence & retailer offers

How much do the ingredient lists overlap?

26%

Ingredients in every formula

19in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

3unique actives

Ingredient rows compared

72rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.

How do the ingredient lists differ?

72 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(53 of 72 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended D'alba [d'Alba] Serum Glow Tension Cover Cushion SPF 50+ PA++++ 17g $33.70 $33.70 at Ballagrio ↗Save	Missha [MISSHA] M Perfect Cover Serum BB Cream PRO SPF 50+ PA ++++ 50ml $24.50 Reference price Save
Basics
Type & size	Serum · size not on the record	Serum · size not on the record
Brand origindiffers	Not recorded	Korean
Offers
Where to buydiffers	$33.70 · Ballagrio	No offers listed
Availabilitydiffers	In stock	No offers listed
Formula
Key activesdiffers	titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, niacinamide, centella asiatica extract, sodium hyaluronate, hyaluronic acid	zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, niacinamide
Free of	Not recorded	Not recorded
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed	pregnancy cautionPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Partially captured — 51 of 123 label entries matched, some checks not run	Partially captured — 40 of 55 label entries matched, some checks not run
Key actives · 3
cica	yes	no
hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hyaluronic acid (salt form) Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 50
a silicone	yes	no
anthemis nobilis flower oil	no	yes
bacillus ferment	no	yes
bifida ferment filtrate	no	yes
bifida ferment lysate	no	yes
c12-15 alkyl benzoate	yes	no
c30-45 alkyldimethylsilyl polypropylsilsesquioxane	yes	no
camellia japonica seed oil	yes	no
ci 77491	no	yes
ci 77492	no	yes
ci 77499	no	yes
dimethylsilanol hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
dipentaerythrityl hexa c5-9 acid esters	yes	no
disodium stearoyl glutamate	no	yes
fragrance	yes	no
glycerin	no	yes
hectorite	no	yes
hexyl cinnamal	yes	no
hippophae rhamnoides fruit oil	yes	no
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hydrolyzed sodium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hydroxypropyltrimonium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
lactobacillus	no	yes
lactobacillus ferment	no	yes
lactobacillus ferment lysate	no	yes
lactococcus ferment	no	yes
lactococcus ferment lysate	no	yes
lauroyl lysine	yes	no
lauryl peg-9 polydimethylsiloxyethyl dimethicone	yes	no
lauryl polyglyceryl-3 polydimethylsiloxyethyl dimethicone	yes	no
linalool	yes	no
macadamia ternifolia seed oil	yes	no
mica	yes	no
neopentyl glycol diheptanoate	yes	no
peg-10 dimethicone	no	yes
pelargonium graveolens flower oil	no	yes
pentylene glycol	no	yes
phenyl trimethicone	yes	no
polycaprylylsilsesquioxane	yes	no
potassium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
saccharomyces ferment Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
silica	yes	no
sodium acetylated hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
sodium hyaluronate crosspolymer Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
sodium hyaluronate dimethylsilanol Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
stearyl acrylate	yes	no
synthetic fluorphlogopite	no	yes
tuber magnatum extract	yes	no
water	yes	no
water	no	yes

D'alba and Missha have labels only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose D'alba if you want Cica in the formula.

Choose Missha if you want a comparable formula for $9.20 less.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

Related formula comparisons

More suggestions →

• D'albaVSAGE20'S Signature Essence Pack Intense Cover SPF50+ PA++++ 14g + Refill 6colors
• MisshaVS[CLIO] Serum Cover Skin Tint SPF 20 PA+++ 30ml
• D'albaVSAGE20'S, Signature Essence Pact, Intense Cover, SPF 50+, 17N, 0.49 oz (14 g)

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.