Vitamin E Vitalizing Sunscreen SPF 50+ and TOCOBO Vita Soft Daily Sun Lotion SPF50+ PA++++ 150ml share 13 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 13Vitamin E Vitalizing Sunscreen SPF 50+ only 15TOCOBO Vita Soft Daily Sun Lotion SPF50+ PA++++ 150ml only 38
Permalink for this comparison →
20%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Sunscreen · size not on the record | Sunscreen · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $16.10 · Cosrx | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key actives | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Free of | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free |
| Heads-updiffers | pregnancy caution · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy caution · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 28 ingredients | Fully parsed · 51 ingredients |
Rest of the labels · 53 | ||
1,2-hexanediol | yes | no |
aminomethyl propanol | no | yes |
asiatic acid | no | yes |
asiaticoside | no | yes |
behenyl alcohol | yes | no |
bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine | no | yes |
butylene glycol | yes | no |
c12-20 alkyl glucoside | yes | no |
c14-22 alcohols | yes | no |
caprylyl glycol | no | yes |
cetearyl alcohol | no | yes |
cetearyl olivate | no | yes |
citronellol | no | yes |
cyanocobalamin | no | yes |
cyclopentasiloxane | yes | no |
dimethiconol | no | yes |
diphenylsiloxy phenyl trimethicone | yes | no |
dipotassium glycyrrhizate | no | yes |
dipropylene glycol | no | yes |
disiloxane | no | yes |
disodium edta | yes | no |
erythritol | no | yes |
ethylhexylglycerin | yes | no |
fatty alcohol (non-drying) | yes | no |
gardenia florida fruit extract | no | yes |
glucose | yes | no |
glyceryl stearate | yes | no |
hexyl cinnamal | no | yes |
hippophae rhamnoides oil | no | yes |
hydroxyacetophenone | no | yes |
hydroxycitronellal | no | yes |
isohexadecane | no | yes |
limonene | no | yes |
linalool | no | yes |
madecassic acid | no | yes |
methyl diisopropyl propionamide | no | yes |
methyl methacrylate crosspolymer | no | yes |
methyl trimethicone | no | yes |
peg-100 stearate | yes | no |
pentylene glycol | no | yes |
phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid | no | yes |
poly c10-30 alkyl acrylate | no | yes |
polymethylsilsesquioxane | no | yes |
potassium cetyl phosphate | yes | no |
sodium stearoyl glutamate | no | yes |
sorbitan oleate | no | yes |
sorbitan olivate | no | yes |
terephthalylidene dicamphor sulfonic acid | no | yes |
trimethylsiloxysilicate | yes | no |
tripropylene glycol | no | yes |
tromethamine | no | yes |
vinyl dimethicone | no | yes |
xanthan gum | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose COSRX if you want a comparable formula for $20.30 less.
Choose Tocobo if you want this formula as listed.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.