Essential storage keeps the site working. Optional cookies and tracking support analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools.
Either choice lets you browse. Change it anytime in the footer. Cookie details.
[Centellian24] Revitalizing Collagen Toner 120ml and numbuzin No.9 NAD+ PDRN Glow Boosting Toner (150ml / 5.07 fl oz) share 14 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 14[Centellian24] Revitalizing Collagen Toner 120ml only 14numbuzin No.9 NAD+ PDRN Glow Boosting Toner (150ml / 5.07 fl oz) only 40
Permalink for this comparison →
Loading product details…
21%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Toner · size not on the record | Toner · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $19.70 · Ballagrio | No offers listed |
| Availabilitydiffers | In stock | No offers listed |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, centella asiatica extract, ceramide np, hyaluronic acid | niacinamide, ceramide np |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | Not recorded |
| Heads-updiffers | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 28 ingredients | Partially captured — 54 of 79 label entries matched, some checks not run |
Key actives · 2 | ||
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
Rest of the labels · 52 | ||
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
numbuzin's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Centellian24 if you want Cica in the formula.
Choose numbuzin if you want a comparable formula for $11.83 less.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.