[SUNGBOON EDITOR] Silk Peptide EGF Intensive Smoothing Toner 300ml vs numbuzin No.9 NAD+ PDRN Glow Boosting Toner (150ml / 5.07 fl oz)

[SUNGBOON EDITOR] Silk Peptide EGF Intensive Smoothing Toner 300ml and numbuzin No.9 NAD+ PDRN Glow Boosting Toner (150ml / 5.07 fl oz) share 22 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

• 
  [SUNGBOON EDITOR] Silk Peptide EGF Intensive Smoothing Toner 300ml
• 
  numbuzin No.9 NAD+ PDRN Glow Boosting Toner (150ml / 5.07 fl oz)

Clear allAdd product2 of 8

Permalink for this comparison →

FitFormulaValueUse together

Full comparison

Loading product details…

Full ingredient comparisonLabels, evidence & retailer offers

How much do the ingredient lists overlap?

27%

Ingredients in every formula

22in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

3unique actives

Ingredient rows compared

82rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.

How do the ingredient lists differ?

82 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(60 of 82 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Sungboon Editor [SUNGBOON EDITOR] Silk Peptide EGF Intensive Smoothing Toner 300ml $37.50 $37.50 at Ballagrio ↗Save	numbuzin numbuzin No.9 NAD+ PDRN Glow Boosting Toner (150ml / 5.07 fl oz) $7.87 Reference price Save
Basics
Type & size	Toner · size not on the record	Toner · size not on the record
Brand origin	Korean	Korean
Offers
Where to buydiffers	$37.50 · Ballagrio	No offers listed
Availabilitydiffers	In stock	No offers listed
Formula
Key activesdiffers	niacinamide, titanium dioxide, ceramide np, sodium hyaluronate, hyaluronic acid	niacinamide, ceramide np
Free of	Not recorded	Not recorded
Heads-up	None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed	None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Partially captured — 50 of 109 label entries matched, some checks not run	Partially captured — 54 of 79 label entries matched, some checks not run
Key actives · 3
hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hyaluronic acid (salt form) Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
titanium dioxide Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 57
acetyl dipeptide-1 cetyl ester	no	yes
acetyl glutamine	yes	no
adenosine triphosphate	no	yes
aloe barbadensis flower extract	no	yes
anhydroxylitol	no	yes
arginine	yes	no
benzoic acid	yes	no
benzyl glycol	yes	no
carbomer	yes	no
cetearyl alcohol	no	yes
citric acid	no	yes
collagen amino acids	yes	no
cyanocobalamin	no	yes
diethoxyethyl succinate	yes	no
dipotassium glycyrrhizate	yes	no
dipropylene glycol	yes	no
elastin	no	yes
ethylhexylglycerin	yes	no
folic acid	yes	no
glucose	no	yes
glutathione	no	yes
glyceryl glucoside	no	yes
hydrolyzed collagen	no	yes
hydrolyzed glycosaminoglycans	yes	no
hydrolyzed silk	yes	no
hydroxyacetophenone	yes	no
hydroxypropyltrimonium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
lecithin	yes	no
luffa cylindrica fruit extract	no	yes
mica	yes	no
myristic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
octyldodecanol	yes	no
palmitic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
peg-40 hydrogenated castor oil	no	yes
phytosterols	no	yes
polyglyceryl-10 laurate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
polyglyceryl-6 laurate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
ppg-17	no	yes
pullulan	no	yes
resveratrol	no	yes
silk amino acids	yes	no
silk extract	yes	no
sodium acetylated hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
sodium benzoate	yes	no
sodium citrate	no	yes
sodium dna	no	yes
sodium hyaluronate crosspolymer Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
sodium phosphate	yes	no
sodium phytate	no	yes
soluble collagen	no	yes
stearic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
t-butyl alcohol	no	yes
tin oxide	yes	no
tripropylene glycol	no	yes
xylitol	no	yes
xylitylglucoside	no	yes

Sungboon Editor and numbuzin have labels only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Sungboon Editor if you want Titanium Dioxide in the formula.

Choose numbuzin if you want a comparable formula for $29.63 less.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

Related formula comparisons

More suggestions →

• Sungboon EditorVSCKD Retino Collagen Small Molecule 300 Collagen Skin Toner 250ml x 2ea
• numbuzinVSAxis-Y, Dark Spot Correcting Glow Toner , 4.23 fl oz (125 ml)
• Sungboon EditorVSNacific, Uyu Cream Toner, 5.07 fl oz (150 ml)

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.