Essential storage keeps the site working. Optional cookies and tracking support analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools.
Either choice lets you browse. Change it anytime in the footer. Cookie details.
[Celladix] Triple Retinol Peeling Pad 120ml 60EA and [Dr.Melaxin] BP Spicule Exfoliating Pad 165ml 70EA share 12 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 12[Celladix] Triple Retinol Peeling Pad 120ml 60EA only 40[Dr.Melaxin] BP Spicule Exfoliating Pad 165ml 70EA only 18
Permalink for this comparison →
Loading product details…
17%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Exfoliant · size not on the record | Exfoliant · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | Not recorded | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $40.20 · Ballagrio | $32.70 · Ballagrio |
| Availability | In stock | In stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, allantoin, hyaluronic acid, sodium hyaluronate, bakuchiol, salicylic acid, panthenol, sodium ascorbyl phosphate, ceramide np, retinal, ascorbic acid, centella asiatica extract | niacinamide, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy cautionPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 52 ingredients | Fully parsed · 30 ingredients |
Key actives · 9 | ||
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
Rest of the labels · 49 | ||
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Celladix if you want Allantoin in the formula.
Choose Dr.Melaxin if you want a comparable formula for $7.50 less.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.