WJ Blemish Red Pine Peeling 30ml and MEDI-PEEL Phyto Cica-Nol B5 Shot Serum 6000 50g share 10 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 10WJ Blemish Red Pine Peeling 30ml only 8MEDI-PEEL Phyto Cica-Nol B5 Shot Serum 6000 50g only 46
Permalink for this comparison →
16%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Exfoliant · size not on the record | Exfoliant · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | Not recorded | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $20.60 · Dodoskin | $37.44 · Dodoskin |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, salicylic acid | niacinamide, hyaluronic acid, sodium hyaluronate, centella asiatica extract, salicylic acid, panthenol, sodium ascorbyl phosphate |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | pregnancy caution · photosensitizingPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 18 ingredients | Fully parsed · 56 ingredients |
Key actives · 5 | ||
cica | no | yes |
hyaluronic acid | no | yes |
hyaluronic acid (salt form) | no | yes |
pro-vitamin b5 | no | yes |
sodium ascorbyl phosphate | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 49 | ||
4-terpineol | yes | no |
adenosine | no | yes |
ananas sativus fruit extract | yes | no |
anhydroxylitol | no | yes |
asiatic acid | no | yes |
asiaticoside | no | yes |
beta-carotene | no | yes |
beta-glucan | yes | no |
biotin | no | yes |
butylene glycol | no | yes |
caprylyl glycol | no | yes |
cellulose | yes | no |
citric acid | no | yes |
colloidal sulfur | no | yes |
cyanocobalamin | no | yes |
decyl glucoside | no | yes |
disodium edta | no | yes |
drying alcohol | yes | no |
folic acid | no | yes |
ginkgo biloba nut extract | no | yes |
glycereth-25 pca isostearate | no | yes |
glycerin | no | yes |
hesperidin | no | yes |
hydrogenated lecithin | no | yes |
hydrolyzed gardenia florida extract | no | yes |
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid | no | yes |
hydrolyzed malt extract | no | yes |
hydrolyzed sponge | no | yes |
hydrolyzed viola tricolor extract | no | yes |
hydroxyacetophenone | no | yes |
madecassic acid | no | yes |
madecassoside | no | yes |
malus domestica fruit extract | no | yes |
morus alba fruit extract | no | yes |
pentylene glycol | no | yes |
phellodendron amurense bark extract | yes | no |
polyglyceryl-10 laurate | no | yes |
propanediol | no | yes |
propylene glycol | yes | no |
prunus mume fruit extract | no | yes |
punica granatum fruit extract | no | yes |
pyridoxine | no | yes |
riboflavin | no | yes |
succinic acid | no | yes |
thiamine hcl | no | yes |
triethyl citrate | yes | no |
tromethamine | no | yes |
xylitol | no | yes |
xylitylglucoside | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Wj if you want a comparable formula for $16.84 less.
Choose Medi-peel if you want Cica in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.