WELLAGE Real Cica Calming Big Embo Toner Pad 70pads / 160ml vs Numbuzin, No.4 Pore Zero Peeled Egg Toner Pad, 70 Pads, 6.42 fl oz (190 ml)

WELLAGE Real Cica Calming Big Embo Toner Pad 70pads / 160ml and Numbuzin, No.4 Pore Zero Peeled Egg Toner Pad, 70 Pads, 6.42 fl oz (190 ml) share 13 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

30%

Ingredients in every formula

13in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

1unique active

Ingredient rows compared

43rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

43 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(30 of 43 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Wellage WELLAGE Real Cica Calming Big Embo Toner Pad 70pads / 160ml $45.00 $45.00 at Kbeautymakeup ↗Save	numbuzin Numbuzin, No.4 Pore Zero Peeled Egg Toner Pad, 70 Pads, 6.42 fl oz (190 ml) $20.95 Save
Basics
Type & size	Toner · size not on the record	Toner · size not on the record
Brand origin	Korean	Korean
Offers
Where to buydiffers	$45.00 · Kbeautymakeup	Not recorded
Availabilitydiffers	Not recorded	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	allantoin, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate, centella asiatica extract	panthenol, sodium hyaluronate, allantoin
Free ofdiffers	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free	sulfate-free, paraben-free, silicone-free
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	pregnancy cautionPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 36 ingredients	Fully parsed · 20 ingredients
Key actives · 1
cica	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 29
arginine	yes	no
asiatic acid	yes	no
asiaticoside	yes	no
betaine	no	yes
cetearyl alcohol	yes	no
dextrin	yes	no
diethoxyethyl succinate	yes	no
dipropylene glycol	yes	no
ethanol	no	yes
ethylhexylglycerin	yes	no
fragrance	no	yes
gardenia florida fruit extract	yes	no
hydrogenated lecithin	yes	no
hydrogenated phosphatidylcholine	yes	no
lactobacillus ferment	yes	no
lecithin	yes	no
madecassic acid	yes	no
madecassoside	yes	no
methylpropanediol	no	yes
oenothera biennis flower extract	no	yes
pentylene glycol	yes	no
polyglyceryl-10 laurate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
polyglyceryl-5 polyricinoleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
sodium citrate	no	yes
sodium stearoyl glutamate	yes	no
sucrose stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
trehalose	no	yes
vitamin e	yes	no
xanthan gum	yes	no

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Wellage if you want Cica in the formula.

Choose numbuzin if you want a comparable formula for $24.05 less.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

• WellageVS[d'Alba] Double Quick Liposome Serum Mask Pad 225ml 100EA
• numbuzinVSnumbuzin No.4 Pore Zero Peeled Egg Toner Pad 70P
• WellageVSd'Alba Double Quick Liposome Calming & Boosting Dual Pad 100ea

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.