Wella Professionals SP Hydrate conditioner for dry hair 1000 ml vs Dove, UV Repair & Glow, Damage Therapy Conditioner, 12 fl oz (355 ml)

Wella Professionals SP Hydrate conditioner for dry hair 1000 ml and Dove, UV Repair & Glow, Damage Therapy Conditioner, 12 fl oz (355 ml) share 9 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 9Wella Professionals SP Hydrate conditioner for dry hair 1000 ml only 22Dove, UV Repair & Glow, Damage Therapy Conditioner, 12 fl oz (355 ml) only 19

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

18%

Ingredients in every formula: 9in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 3unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 50rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

50 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(41 of 50 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Wella Wella Professionals SP Hydrate conditioner for dry hair 1000 ml $37.00	Recommended Dove Dove, UV Repair & Glow, Damage Therapy Conditioner, 12 fl oz (355 ml) $5.43
Basics
Type & size	Conditioner · size not on the record	Conditioner · size not on the record
Brand origindiffers	Not recorded	European
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	urea	lactic acid, niacinamide
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, silicone-free	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free
Heads-updiffers	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	photosensitizing · fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 31 ingredients	Fully parsed · 28 ingredients
Key actives · 3
aha exfoliant (gentle)	no	yes
urea	yes	no
vitamin b3	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 38
a silicone	no	yes
aminopropyl dimethicone	yes	no
amodimethicone	no	yes
aspartic acid	yes	no
behentrimonium chloride	no	yes
benzyl benzoate	yes	no
chenopodium quinoa seed extract	no	yes
ci 17200	no	yes
ci 19140	no	yes
ci 47005	yes	no
citronellol	no	yes
dextrin	yes	no
dipropylene glycol	no	yes
disodium edta	no	yes
fatty alcohol (non-drying)	yes	no
ferulic acid	no	yes
fructose	yes	no
glucose	yes	no
glutamic acid	yes	no
glyceryl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
hexyl nicotinate	yes	no
hexylene glycol	yes	no
hydrolyzed cicer seed extract	no	yes
hydroxypropyl guar	yes	no
limonene	yes	no
methylparaben	yes	no
oleyl alcohol	yes	no
phenoxyethanol	yes	no
propylparaben	yes	no
sodium benzoate	no	yes
sodium chloride	no	yes
sodium citrate	no	yes
sodium gluconate	no	yes
stearyl alcohol	yes	no
sucrose	yes	no
tocopheryl acetate	no	yes
water	yes	no
water	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Wella if you want Urea in the formula.

Choose Dove if you want AHA exfoliant (gentle) in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.