Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml vs Aussie, Miracle Volume, Shampoo, 12.1 fl oz (360 ml)

Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml and Aussie, Miracle Volume, Shampoo, 12.1 fl oz (360 ml) share 13 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 13Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml only 20Aussie, Miracle Volume, Shampoo, 12.1 fl oz (360 ml) only 3

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

36%

Ingredients in every formula: 13in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 3unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 36rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

36 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(23 of 36 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Wella Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml $42.00	Aussie Aussie, Miracle Volume, Shampoo, 12.1 fl oz (360 ml) $6.42
Basics
Type & size	Shampoo · size not on the record	Shampoo · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	panthenol, salicylic acid, lactic acid	Not recorded
Free ofdiffers	alcohol-free	alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 33 ingredients	Fully parsed · 16 ingredients
Key actives · 3
aha exfoliant (gentle)	yes	no
bha exfoliant	yes	no
pro-vitamin b5	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 20
a silicone	yes	no
bambusa vulgaris shoot extract	no	yes
benzyl salicylate	yes	no
cocamide mea	yes	no
glycerin	yes	no
glycol distearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride	yes	no
hexyl cinnamal	yes	no
hydroxypropyl methylcellulose	no	yes
limonene	yes	no
linalool	yes	no
lycium barbarum fruit extract	yes	no
magnesium chloride	yes	no
magnesium nitrate	yes	no
methylparaben	yes	no
oleic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
potassium sorbate	yes	no
sodium hydroxide	yes	no
terminalia ferdinandiana fruit extract	no	yes
trisodium ethylenediamine disuccinate	yes	no

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Wella if you want Pro-vitamin B5 in the formula.

Choose Aussie if you want a comparable formula for $35.58 less.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.