Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml vs TRESemmé, Rich Moisture Conditioner, 16.5 fl oz (488 ml)

Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml and TRESemmé, Rich Moisture Conditioner, 16.5 fl oz (488 ml) share 9 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 9Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml only 33TRESemmé, Rich Moisture Conditioner, 16.5 fl oz (488 ml) only 14

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

16%

Ingredients in every formula: 9in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 2unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 56rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

56 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(47 of 56 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Wella Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml $26.00	Recommended Tresemmé TRESemmé, Rich Moisture Conditioner, 16.5 fl oz (488 ml) $5.24
Basics
Type & size	Conditioner · size not on the record	Conditioner · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	panthenol, lactic acid	ascorbic acid, panthenol, niacinamide, lactic acid
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	photosensitizing · fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 42 ingredients	Fully parsed · 23 ingredients
Key actives · 2
vitamin b3	no	yes
vitamin c	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 45
a silicone	no	yes
alpha-isomethyl ionone	yes	no
amyl cinnamal	no	yes
ascorbyl palmitate Pregnancy: generally fine Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
behentrimonium chloride	no	yes
benzyl salicylate	yes	no
bht	yes	no
biotin	no	yes
butylparaben	yes	no
camellia sinensis leaf extract	yes	no
cetrimonium chloride	no	yes
citral	yes	no
citric acid	yes	no
citronellol	yes	no
coumarin	yes	no
dipropylene glycol	no	yes
drying alcohol	yes	no
ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate Pregnancy: caution	yes	no
ethylparaben	yes	no
fatty alcohol (non-drying)	yes	no
geraniol	yes	no
glycerin	yes	no
guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride	yes	no
hexyl cinnamal	yes	no
hydroxyethylcellulose	yes	no
imidazolidinyl urea	yes	no
lycium barbarum fruit extract	yes	no
methylchloroisothiazolinone	no	yes
methylisothiazolinone	no	yes
oleic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
orbignya oleifera seed oil	yes	no
peg-7 propylheptyl ether	no	yes
phenoxyethanol	yes	no
potassium sorbate	yes	no
propylene glycol	yes	no
propylparaben	yes	no
pvp	yes	no
sodium benzoate	yes	no
sodium chloride	no	yes
stearalkonium chloride	yes	no
stearamidopropyl dimethylamine	no	yes
tetrasodium edta	yes	no
vitamin e	yes	no
water	yes	no
water	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Wella if you want this formula as listed.

Choose Tresemmé if you want Vitamin C in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.