Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml and Helia-D Botanic Concept Moisturizing cream for very dry skin 50 ml share 11 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 11Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Dry Conditioner for Dry and Damaged Hair (Wonder) - Volume: 150 ml only 31Helia-D Botanic Concept Moisturizing cream for very dry skin 50 ml only 15
Permalink for this comparison →
19%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Conditioner · size not on the record | Conditioner · size not on the record |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Availability | in stock | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | panthenol, lactic acid | sodium hyaluronate, centella asiatica extract, panthenol, allantoin |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free |
| Heads-updiffers | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 42 ingredients | Fully parsed · 26 ingredients |
Key actives · 4 | ||
aha exfoliant (gentle) | yes | no |
allantoin | no | yes |
cica | no | yes |
hyaluronic acid (salt form) | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 42 | ||
a silicone | no | yes |
alpha-isomethyl ionone | yes | no |
amodimethicone | yes | no |
ascorbyl palmitate | yes | no |
benzyl salicylate | yes | no |
bht | yes | no |
butylparaben | yes | no |
camellia sinensis leaf extract | yes | no |
cetearyl nonanoate | no | yes |
citral | yes | no |
citric acid | yes | no |
citronellol | yes | no |
coco-caprylate | no | yes |
coumarin | yes | no |
drying alcohol | yes | no |
ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate | yes | no |
ethylhexylglycerin | no | yes |
ethylparaben | yes | no |
fatty alcohol (non-drying) | yes | no |
geraniol | yes | no |
glyceryl stearate se | no | yes |
guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride | yes | no |
hexyl cinnamal | yes | no |
hydrogenated polydecene | no | yes |
hydroxyethylcellulose | yes | no |
imidazolidinyl urea | yes | no |
limonene | yes | no |
linalool | yes | no |
lycium barbarum fruit extract | yes | no |
oleic acid | yes | no |
orbignya oleifera seed oil | yes | no |
panax ginseng root extract | no | yes |
phospholipids | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-10 stearate | no | yes |
propylene glycol | yes | no |
propylparaben | yes | no |
pvp | yes | no |
sodium acrylates copolymer | no | yes |
sodium hydroxide | no | yes |
stearalkonium chloride | yes | no |
tetrasodium edta | yes | no |
wine | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Wella if you want AHA exfoliant (gentle) in the formula.
Choose Helia-d if you want Cica in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.