VT COSMETICS Pro Cica Daily Soothing Mask 350g 30ea and MEDIHEAL Derma Synergy Wrapping Mask Calming Care (Tea Tree X Cica) 25ml X 14ea share 15 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 15VT COSMETICS Pro Cica Daily Soothing Mask 350g 30ea only 33MEDIHEAL Derma Synergy Wrapping Mask Calming Care (Tea Tree X Cica) 25ml X 14ea only 17
Permalink for this comparison →
23%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Mask · size not on the record | Mask · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $21.84 · Dodoskin | $45.00 · Kbeautymakeup |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | sodium hyaluronate, panthenol, centella asiatica extract | centella asiatica extract, panthenol |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 48 ingredients | Fully parsed · 32 ingredients |
Key actives · 1 | ||
hyaluronic acid (salt form) | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 49 | ||
adenosine | no | yes |
alanine | yes | no |
aminobutyric acid | no | yes |
anhydroxylitol | yes | no |
asiatic acid | yes | no |
asiaticoside | yes | no |
aspartic acid | yes | no |
bambusa vulgaris leaf extract | no | yes |
betaine | no | yes |
caprylyl glycol | yes | no |
centella asiatica leaf extract | no | yes |
centella asiatica root extract | no | yes |
cysteine | yes | no |
diglycerin | no | yes |
dipotassium glycyrrhizate | yes | no |
fragrance | yes | no |
fructan | yes | no |
gluconolactone | no | yes |
glucose | yes | no |
glutamic acid | yes | no |
glycerin | yes | no |
glycine | yes | no |
histidine | yes | no |
honey extract | yes | no |
houttuynia cordata extract | no | yes |
hydrogenated lecithin | no | yes |
hydroxyacetophenone | no | yes |
isoleucine | yes | no |
leucine | yes | no |
linum usitatissimum seed extract | no | yes |
lysine | yes | no |
madecassic acid | yes | no |
madecassoside | yes | no |
methionine | yes | no |
pantolactone | no | yes |
pantothenic acid | no | yes |
phenylalanine | yes | no |
polyglyceryl-10 laurate | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-4 caprate | yes | no |
portulaca oleracea extract | yes | no |
proline | yes | no |
propolis extract | yes | no |
royal jelly extract | yes | no |
serine | yes | no |
threonine | yes | no |
tremella fuciformis polysaccharide | no | yes |
tyrosine | yes | no |
valine | yes | no |
zinc pca | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose VT Cosmetics if you want a comparable formula for $23.16 less.
Choose Mediheal if you avoid fragrance.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.