Vt Cosmetics PDRN Toner 250ml and Centella Toning Toner share 9 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 9Vt Cosmetics PDRN Toner 250ml only 15Centella Toning Toner only 4
Permalink for this comparison →
32%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Toner · size not on the record | Toner · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | Not recorded | $5.00 · Skin1004 |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, allantoin, panthenol, centella asiatica extract, ceramide np | centella asiatica extract, niacinamide, hyaluronic acid |
| Free of | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-up | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 24 ingredients | Fully parsed · 13 ingredients |
Key actives · 4 | ||
allantoin | yes | no |
ceramide np | yes | no |
hyaluronic acid | no | yes |
pro-vitamin b5 | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 15 | ||
arginine | yes | no |
butylene glycol | yes | no |
erythritol | yes | no |
gluconolactone | no | yes |
glucose | yes | no |
glycerin | yes | no |
glyceryl glucoside | yes | no |
glycosphingolipids | yes | no |
hydrogenated lecithin | yes | no |
hydroxyacetophenone | yes | no |
panax ginseng root extract | yes | no |
sodium citrate | no | yes |
sodium dna | yes | no |
tromethamine | no | yes |
water | yes | no |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose VT Cosmetics if you want Allantoin in the formula.
Choose SKIN1004 if you want a comparable formula for $10.84 less.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.