VT COSMETICS Cica Mild Cleansing Tissues 240g 50ea and Dr.G RED BLEMISH For Man All In One Wash 500ml share 12 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 12VT COSMETICS Cica Mild Cleansing Tissues 240g 50ea only 21Dr.G RED BLEMISH For Man All In One Wash 500ml only 22
Permalink for this comparison →
22%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Cleanser · size not on the record | Cleanser · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $3.96 · Dodoskin | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | centella asiatica extract, sodium hyaluronate | centella asiatica extract, salicylic acid |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 33 ingredients | Fully parsed · 34 ingredients |
Key actives · 2 | ||
bha exfoliant | no | yes |
hyaluronic acid (salt form) | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 41 | ||
aspalathus linearis leaf extract | yes | no |
cetylpyridinium chloride | yes | no |
chamaecyparis obtusa leaf extract | no | yes |
chrysanthellum indicum extract | yes | no |
cocamidopropyl pg-dimonium chloride phosphate | yes | no |
coix lacryma-jobi ma-yuen seed extract | yes | no |
dipropylene glycol | yes | no |
disodium cocoamphodiacetate | no | yes |
disodium edta | yes | no |
drying alcohol | yes | no |
ethylhexylglycerin | yes | no |
eucalyptus globulus leaf extract | no | yes |
glycerin | no | yes |
glyceryl caprylate | no | yes |
hexylene glycol | no | yes |
houttuynia cordata extract | yes | no |
lauryl glucoside | no | yes |
lauryl hydroxysultaine | no | yes |
melia azadirachta flower extract | no | yes |
melia azadirachta leaf extract | no | yes |
melissa officinalis leaf extract | yes | no |
mentha rotundifolia leaf extract | no | yes |
menthyl lactate | no | yes |
nelumbo nucifera flower extract | yes | no |
olive oil peg-8 esters | yes | no |
paeonia lactiflora root extract | yes | no |
peg-60 hydrogenated castor oil | yes | no |
peg-7 glyceryl cocoate | yes | no |
phenethyl alcohol | no | yes |
phenoxyethanol | yes | no |
propanediol | no | yes |
propolis extract | yes | no |
prunus mume fruit extract | yes | no |
sodium chloride | no | yes |
sodium citrate | yes | no |
sodium cocoyl isethionate | no | yes |
sodium lauryl glucose carboxylate | no | yes |
sodium methyl cocoyl taurate | no | yes |
sodium phytate | no | yes |
tetrasodium glutamate diacetate | no | yes |
zinc ricinoleate | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose VT Cosmetics if you want a comparable formula for $26.62 less.
Choose Dr.G if you want BHA exfoliant in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.