thim Heartleaf Vegan Pore Pack Cleanser 160g vs [Arencia] Rice + LHA Pore Control Rice Cake Cleanser 150ml

thim Heartleaf Vegan Pore Pack Cleanser 160g and [Arencia] Rice + LHA Pore Control Rice Cake Cleanser 150ml share 13 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 13thim Heartleaf Vegan Pore Pack Cleanser 160g only 31[Arencia] Rice + LHA Pore Control Rice Cake Cleanser 150ml only 15

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

22%

Ingredients in every formula: 13in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 6unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 59rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

59 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(46 of 59 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Thim thim Heartleaf Vegan Pore Pack Cleanser 160g $25.48 $25.48 at Dodoskin ↗	Arencia [Arencia] Rice + LHA Pore Control Rice Cake Cleanser 150ml $29.90
Basics
Type & size	Cleanser · size not on the record	Cleanser · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buydiffers	$25.48 · Dodoskin	Not recorded
Formula
Key activesdiffers	sodium hyaluronate, hyaluronic acid, allantoin, squalane	salicylic acid, allantoin, panthenol, niacinamide
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free
Heads-updiffers	fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 44 ingredients	Fully parsed · 28 ingredients
Key actives · 6
bha exfoliant	no	yes
hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hyaluronic acid (salt form) Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
pro-vitamin b5	no	yes
squalane	yes	no
vitamin b3	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 40
alanine	yes	no
arginine	yes	no
aspartic acid	yes	no
butylene glycol	no	yes
capryloyl salicylic acid Pregnancy: caution	no	yes
coptis japonica extract	no	yes
dextrin	no	yes
fragrance	yes	no
gluconolactone	yes	no
glutamic acid	yes	no
glycine	yes	no
histidine	yes	no
houttuynia cordata extract	yes	no
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hydrolyzed sodium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hydroxypropyltrimonium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
isoleucine	yes	no
leucine	yes	no
methionine	yes	no
ornithine	yes	no
oryza sativa bran water	no	yes
oryza sativa extract	no	yes
oryza sativa lees extract	no	yes
palmitic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
pearl extract	no	yes
pentylene glycol	yes	no
phenylalanine	yes	no
potassium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
proline	yes	no
prunus amygdalus dulcis oil	no	yes
rice ferment filtrate	no	yes
serine	yes	no
sodium acetylated hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
sodium chloride	yes	no
sodium hyaluronate crosspolymer Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
stearic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
taurine	yes	no
theobroma cacao seed extract	no	yes
valine	yes	no
water	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Thim if you want Squalane in the formula.

Choose Arencia if you want BHA exfoliant in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.