Essential storage keeps the site working. Optional cookies and tracking support analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools.
Either choice lets you browse. Change it anytime in the footer. Cookie details.
The SAEM Snail Essential EX Wrinkle Solution Toner 150ml and SKINFOOD Royal Honey Propolis Enrich Toner 160ml share 12 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 12The SAEM Snail Essential EX Wrinkle Solution Toner 150ml only 38SKINFOOD Royal Honey Propolis Enrich Toner 160ml only 21
Permalink for this comparison →
Loading product details…
17%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Toner · size not on the record | Toner · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | No offers listed | No offers listed |
| Availability | No offers listed | No offers listed |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | snail secretion filtrate, niacinamide, sodium hyaluronate | ceramide np |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, paraben-free |
| Heads-up | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 50 ingredients | Fully parsed · 33 ingredients |
Key actives · 4 | ||
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
Rest of the labels · 55 | ||
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.