Tage Cica-Tree Shaking Glow Sun Fixer SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml vs AMUSE Dew Moisture 365 Vegan Sunscreen 40ml

Tage Cica-Tree Shaking Glow Sun Fixer SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml and AMUSE Dew Moisture 365 Vegan Sunscreen 40ml share 22 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 22Tage Cica-Tree Shaking Glow Sun Fixer SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml only 22AMUSE Dew Moisture 365 Vegan Sunscreen 40ml only 13

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

39%

Ingredients in every formula: 22in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 2unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 57rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

57 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(35 of 57 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Tage Tage Cica-Tree Shaking Glow Sun Fixer SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml $20.18	Amuse AMUSE Dew Moisture 365 Vegan Sunscreen 40ml $24.96 $24.96 at Dodoskin ↗
Basics
Type & size	Sunscreen · size not on the record	Sunscreen · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buydiffers	Not recorded	$24.96 · Dodoskin
Formula
Key activesdiffers	niacinamide, centella asiatica extract, tranexamic acid, ceramide np	niacinamide, ceramide np
Free ofdiffers	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free
Heads-up	fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 44 ingredients	Fully parsed · 35 ingredients
Key actives · 2
cica	yes	no
tranexamic acid	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 33
a silicone	yes	no
arginine	yes	no
behenyl alcohol	no	yes
bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine	yes	no
butyloctyl salicylate	yes	no
c12-15 alkyl benzoate	yes	no
ceramide eop	yes	no
collagen	no	yes
decyl glucoside	no	yes
diethylamino hydroxybenzoyl hexyl benzoate	yes	no
dipropylene glycol	no	yes
disiloxane	yes	no
ethylhexylglycerin	yes	no
eucalyptus globulus leaf extract	yes	no
fragrance	no	yes
glyceryl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
houttuynia cordata extract	yes	no
isononyl isononanoate	yes	no
pentylene glycol	no	yes
phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid	yes	no
phytosphingosine	yes	no
polyglyceryl-10 myristate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
polyglyceryl-6 distearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
portulaca oleracea extract	yes	no
potassium cetyl phosphate	yes	no
propanediol	no	yes
sodium stearoyl glutamate	no	yes
stearic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
terephthalylidene dicamphor sulfonic acid	yes	no
ubiquinone	no	yes
vitamin e	no	yes
xanthan gum	no	yes
xylitol	yes	no

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Tage if you want Cica in the formula.

Choose Amuse if you want this formula as listed.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.