[Sulwhasoo] First Care Activating Serum 90ml and medicube Zero Pore Serum 2.0 (37ml / 1.25 fl oz) share 12 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 12[Sulwhasoo] First Care Activating Serum 90ml only 35medicube Zero Pore Serum 2.0 (37ml / 1.25 fl oz) only 20
Permalink for this comparison →
18%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Serum · size not on the record | Serum · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $96.60 · Ballagrio | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key actives | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed | fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 47 ingredients | Fully parsed · 32 ingredients |
Rest of the labels · 55 | ||
a silicone | no | yes |
adenosine | yes | no |
betaine | yes | no |
bis-peg-18 methyl ether dimethyl silane | yes | no |
camellia japonica flower extract | no | yes |
caprylyl glycol | no | yes |
carrageenan | yes | no |
cellulose gum | yes | no |
cetyl ethylhexanoate | no | yes |
chlorphenesin | no | yes |
cinnamomum zeylanicum bark extract | no | yes |
citral | yes | no |
citric acid | yes | no |
citronellol | yes | no |
cyclohexasiloxane | no | yes |
cyclopentasiloxane | no | yes |
cymbopogon schoenanthus extract | no | yes |
dextrin | yes | no |
drying alcohol | yes | no |
fragrance | yes | no |
geraniol | yes | no |
glyceryl caprylate | yes | no |
glyceryl polymethacrylate | yes | no |
glyceryl stearate | no | yes |
honey | yes | no |
hydrogenated lecithin | yes | no |
hydrolyzed soybean extract | yes | no |
lentinus edodes extract | yes | no |
lilium candidum bulb extract | yes | no |
lycium chinense fruit extract | yes | no |
madecassoside | yes | no |
mentha suaveolens leaf extract | no | yes |
methyl trimethicone | yes | no |
natto gum | yes | no |
ophiopogon japonicus root extract | yes | no |
paeonia albiflora root extract | yes | no |
paeonia lactiflora root extract | yes | no |
peg-100 stearate | no | yes |
peg-60 hydrogenated castor oil | yes | no |
pelargonium graveolens extract | no | yes |
pentylene glycol | yes | no |
phenoxyethanol | no | yes |
pinus palustris leaf extract | no | yes |
polygonatum odoratum rhizome extract | yes | no |
polyisobutene | no | yes |
propanediol | yes | no |
prunus mume fruit extract | yes | no |
rehmannia glutinosa root extract | yes | no |
sanguisorba officinalis root extract | no | yes |
scutellaria baicalensis root extract | yes | no |
sodium polyacrylate | no | yes |
ulmus davidiana root extract | no | yes |
uncaria gambir extract | no | yes |
vitamin e | yes | no |
xanthan gum | yes | no |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Sulwhasoo if you want this formula as listed.
Choose medicube if you want a comparable formula for $77.68 less.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.